'agsAva5J%.Agucz,%, BAiiL'5é!L.Q§iE -553 um. huflfifi U?' WM¥N£W'fiKfl Hifirfi 5033:?-'3?' W€fifiNWi"%Wfi WWFW KEWUKY" €33" %.flRNATfiKA HEWM WUQR? U? KRKNJVEFMKA NEG" £2€'..?Uifi'§" wk' mmwmmam "REM COINS IN THE HIGH CUBE? GF KfiRHATAKR, fiANGAbORE DJWEEE: rmxs was 39.9 cm' GE' A9511» 2:51:39 H BEFORE THE} Howsna MR. JUSTICE N.AuAH_u §---... L'
s.’.9.N.4m2 05′ zooiftsfigcgcrx -:’
BETYEEN: ‘ . ‘
sin: .c:. rt. GOPALAKRISHHA HAO,
SEO LATE 3RI.C.NAHJHNDA RHO;%_ V
68 mans, amzsam ca:mfszAL –
sovr. SERVICE, GANDHI. PAZ3$AR– ”
1′-IAIN mm, 5AsAvA:m:;u£:.=1′,’- ‘ V
BANGALME:-569 01:104. .. ..
” ‘VEEYITIONER
{BY 39.1.5. $«;’r£;&Haiji,f§.DAS§T5;!€¥, iufiiacgvcféfii
ss<r.c.r;v_.s»:»z~zAs::3%r.:'2.Ia;rmb' _ * –
SKO LATE SaI.C,NfiHJUHDh; 49,
man 35:23:'? ~.':3a»YEms"_;j . '
AS L.R. 0F LATE $HT.9AfiMAVATHAEHA
am 8-L§'1'='£2., smmxx' sauna RAIN a.-I}:-.53,
..RE8?OKBEHT
{3v'–s§'a–z'.:4fi§£i:£;:a;:3A?rH Philifi 3,. AEWQCATE}
'fHIs"'.«w';i$. FILEE 1329:3512 ARTICLES 226 AND 22':
'ma: "::::;r3's=rx'r1mcvN or {N313 we QUASH THE eassa
. 'U3Tfi*28.i1.2OG6 IN MISC.341/RG05 ON THE FILE OF
-.1’e?”.A::£aL. cxw cxvzr. suns: (c::n«r-32) AT .au~rzm:ua5z-
»_ ._g:., “..B:s.1a::Az.0a£ cm”? mm ALI.-mt ms rszzs-::.3~s1i2a05 ma
THIS Y.?. COMING QR FQR QRBERS THIS HAY, THE
uCOURT HADE THE ¥fiLLOWING:*
GREEK
The lesgal representatives of the plajfigiff
in c=.S.No.23′?5/1993 had made an applicat;§’in:r:«’..’;;§:§§ié;f
Grder 4′! Rule 1 of CPC for rmdew af
in 0.S.Ho.23′?5/1993 urging the.’£c¥i3;Q§r3._;1§ g.tft:::.;;a§{S}_
a) The City Civil Judge”§_m;_1.ht fa %meT%%h¢%;a%%
that the allagad wi11″”a.§’taa 2*?~..1M %0.~§;9’éi:
was mat prcxvea’._.ar:d,””‘it’ ‘ 93$ r{dt”‘~A
accardance with 935 the
Indian Su;ca5siA:>n ‘_=,fi.§:f_§:.f_ -‘while
discusaigng’ ‘ V ithe . ,V,;z;”;§§::uice:: an
banal: 53t.3:’;i:_a ” g;gim:::: namly P:-r.1,
the «.’éau ljdV nczt have
esVéé§é6* ~ §§f’,:”tne Eéiiient features
in:”~.;~§’)§atiV§$t§i “t§ discrepancy in
the: ‘c!a tes Thia aspect was
vitag, _ jerk” <§'onaidérai%}5.<an to conclude
.3lla§gd…….a_ri11 was executed an
I-3'§?'.~.1_;o.1A'S%T_1*.4VA az:d the evidence of Pw.1 as
"ezfiéli 'av:€j~~..f;;'yaé~1§:-.V.1~::x.f 913.12 being silamt can
t3i=::,__" saz::e J.=.7.;;3;§ect. Hsncs, this apparent
Q e::reQ-1*.' <5; "record is one czar:-xrectable by
V 2~m.ziaw."V–* .
V. V”1″‘hé next ground is regarding
..m3.%intainabiiity of the suit after the
death mi’ the original plaintiff
wwwmw W vwwmawmfimmm wawm mwwmjrf ,.w;If'” mmxwmmwe ramm wwmm war mmmmmmwa HEESH CGUM” Q? K&RM’M”&%& Hififi cwum” KW wmwémmm mm’: CGUR’
smt.Padmavat:hamma. This issue auqht ta
have been answered and held in favmsr
0f the aafarzdant and further in
m. Cfh Vw eff”