P.T.Aniyankunju vs The Secretary on 11 March, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 7461 of 2009(C)


1. P.T.ANIYANKUNJU, PUTHENVEETTIL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SECRETARY,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.DEEPAK

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :11/03/2009

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                       ==============
                   W.P.(C) NO. 7461 OF 2009 (C)
                   ====================

            Dated this the 11th day of March, 2009

                         J U D G M E N T

Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, transfer of permit was

allowed. However, the same was not endorsed for the reason that

clearance certificate from the Motor Transport Workers Welfare

Fund Board was not produced. It is stated that subsequently

petitioner obtained Ext.P2 and although the same was also

produced before the respondent, despite having made Ext.P3

representation seeking early orders, endorsement in pursuance to

Ext.P1 has not so far been effected. It is with that grievance, the

writ petition is filed.

2. If as stated by the petitioner, the reason for not

endorsing transfer of permit allowed by Ext.P1 was the non

production of the clearance certificate, with the production of

Ext.P2, there cannot be any justification for further delay in this

matter.

3. Now that the petitioner submits that he has also

produced Ext.P2, I direct the respondent to endorse the transfer

WPC 7461/09
:2 :

of permit, if non production of clearance certificate was the only

reason for the delay.

Writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions.

Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the

respondent for compliance.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp