High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Panakaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Singh vs State Of Bihar on 25 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Panakaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Singh vs State Of Bihar on 25 June, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     Cr.Misc. No.16945 of 2010
            PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH @ PANKAJ SINGH, SON OF LATE AWADHESH
           SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BAKARGANJ BEHIND MONA CINEMA,
                      P.S. PIRBAHORE, DISTRICT PATNA.
                                                 Versus
                                        THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                               -----------

02. 25.06.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a

case registered for the offence under Section-307 and other allied

Sections of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on his behalf that he is

named in the First Information Report along with three others including

Santosh Kumar Singh and Gopal Singh. It is also submitted that allegation

against the petitioner, Santosh Kumar Singh and Gopal Singh is similar and

the dispute has already been settled outside the court between the parties.

Appreciating such fact Santosh Kumar Singh and Gopal Singh have been

admitted to the privilege of bail in the event of arrest by another Bench of

this Court under orders dated 3.2.2009, Annexure-4.

Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the State, I direct the

petitioner to surrender in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in

connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No.353 of 2004 within four weeks from

the date of receipt of this order in the court below and his case be also

considered in the light of the orders dated 3.2.2009, Annexure-4 and if the

case of the petitioner is found similar to that of Santosh Kumar Singh and

Gopal Singh then he be also allowed similar treatment.

Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on

payment of usual charges by the petitioner.

      Rajesh/                                                    (V.N.Sinha,J.)