High Court Kerala High Court

Pathikara Rajan vs The State Of Kerala on 18 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Pathikara Rajan vs The State Of Kerala on 18 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3209 of 2009()


1. PATHIKARA RAJAN,AGED 38 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. ARANGATHKUZHI JOSHI,AGED 30 YEARS,
3. POOVATHUMOOTIL BABY @ SEBASTIAN,
4. POOVATHUMOOTIL SHAJI,AGED 35 YEARS,
5. POOVATHUMOOTIL JAYAPALAN,AGED 25 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :18/06/2009

 O R D E R
                          K.T.SANKARAN, J.
                      ------------------------------
                         B.A.No.3209 of 2009
                     -------------------------------
                Dated this the 18th day of June, 2009



                               ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are the accused nos.1

to 5 in Crime No.82 of 2009 of Vellarikundu Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 323, 324 and 308 read with Section 149

of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

that another crime was registered as Crime No.83 of 2009 of the same

police station in which the defacto complainant is the uncle of the third

petitioner. It is not as such a counter case, submitted the learned

public prosecutor. It is not necessary to decide that question in this

Bail Application. In Crime No.83 of 2009, it is submitted that accused

persons were arrested and they were remanded to judicial custody.

4. I have gone through the case diary. Though the injuries

are simple in nature, it is to be noted that four persons sustained

injuries. According to the prosecution, weapons were also used for

commission of the offence.

BA No.3209/2009 2

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence, the allegations made and other

circumstances, I do not think that this is a fit case where anticipatory

bail can be granted to the petitioners.

The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed.

K.T.SANKARAN,
JUDGE
csl