Karnataka High Court
Sri B T Thimmaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 18 June, 2009
.1 mm wwmmxwxmmmmimw awwm WW" mmmmmmwm wwm agwwm WE" %fi.W%§a%"E'2i?aW'% Wfiéfifi flfifififim W?' %%W"*«¥;im"$/'&§'%§fi §i"§E€f§§°*% fififfiéfififigi" $5' §€§%.WW7&'¥&W@e i"§M3a§'*§ @
IN THE HIGH COURT GF KA.RNA.TA.KA AT BAN
DATED THIS THE 18TH my are mm 209% %
BEFORE:
THE HCNBLE MR. JUSTICE & '
wan' flTI"F§G1~? m2343,gm!«G§ _M;;;';;_'%}% 1 %
BETWEEN ;
SfiB~T.
SiesT1'5urmmGowda
ge.d.a3:s«::su£51y6fi'Ss_
Villa: Accamttaxzt, j
Bidadi Hohfig » V.
p
Bmga1o::'éRnIsl.I}im§1§t. . ...PE'I'I1'iQNER
(By " « Aévc-can for
Shzci M {§'iafifi'p1'3fK$§?\, ';'i.§£1aee§¢}
L
% z3.evenu¢;}egmmn(sa:v1:m;:,
1~.a.s.3:;iiaing,
vmm vmm;
[ 'E_@ga1oIe-5&3 66:.
V 2.K Lakayfi
M.3.Esu1'ldj11g,
Vi$'1mVwdhi,
Bmaierc-»56¢.".1 {K3},
By im Regmm.
WW mum" W?" §'%§%§W§¥-"°%?$%H5§%?M% WEWW WW fififiwfiifikfififi. IJ;'"%§%«'3§""§ amswmw W? §'
{By 3111 em}-many C..UI1a1, A:&vu:;'$éj'fr.§r._.:
Addifimai Gnvarnmeni Ad'¢a€m,£ 3) v '
This W231 519:6" .Artic}cs 22$ and 227 at
the C of {:31} for the rcccsxfis
'before the ::;nmd:_:n:£.._na.3* and " mam mda the
ariginal of 1_,2G{3a'5 as mime gr Artislcs
14 md ;_::fj£t1d£2L '&d am 1m%.r and unjua.
an an mug this day, the
Emm .
'ORDER
~ am'.
% an the cempmsm afarmse: B.C'.Mx2:rthj; cf
Bidafi habfi, Rmnmmasn Taluk,
Rural Dimci, tbs fiecaxzé rmendm Laskay@ had
m wdhfi taken W mvcmgafian fa: allgad
afRs.29fi&:'- fir $3. effiaal favazzr, an 138.199'? ya
the aemnzi remdmt afiar mnfiuaing invwfigfiém has
submitted repeat: a an }3,11.29€i§. Even flwugh 111$ mqwy is
smié ie have cemxrxenced in the yea 2032, it was eamttuded in
Z
5"'§§€:§§"§ arzmm" fiéfi' §%"T.g%%¥%fifé%.§'i'fi 5"-fififi $28
the yw 2906 m1dt}m"eafieIfl2a reyoxthas ham fumished.
zinmtigafian, thc Lakayfl had even mwereai 3
the cam af Scsaiaxns Judga,Bmgale1'= meal in
C.C.I*€o.19s'1999F. The goceefizgs V
pfliliitmfl' nf afi the chmes
:3(z)(a) efthe Prevwxicsn af :98a;% the A
said mm: at" asqmal,
an wings! bcfarc this
This cm by judsmem
the afigad chases "wean:
mt cm by the Lskayukta md
attafinfi fixaliry. Hawevm; the
hm iniam the mm mm
% enquiry W miuaed ima Articles of
* is is me 'an cfthe pefitianer ma thn firs:
AA Vrwfiafiidaaislikelymixfifiwfunheracfinnenflw bms' afthe
lmémtha angina! An.nex::J:a«-A nmnnly, the mod; afthe
.'~7».mi :2 «:..m.«w'wam.rr: Wm iW%%%.§W&%&!%M:'°K.£WL maawm §w'w'??fifi¢W WW WMKWWEMWM WEMN Qgflvtfifig W3" 9" I"
Lazhy@ flaw 13.li.2fiG5, evm thcaugh the gatfiarm was
aguificdhyfimfiwglanfifinwtizzfimmrxfizfitaicfia méthisww
hrmiutefhenofieenfthethjxdmpanfimu. Infm,th¢
3
.m- 'mfl("|fi '8 mI"\MHanr"m M
pefinierzmhaving breruglitthistothemtertticsnaarfthefljird
rflpfifidmtt, the attic: af acquiml which has 'am A'
kw»-w-W-wwwwm 'W-6 -Ma»m-cum:
However, sima the repeat at 'V
thm the swccrad reswndent may fia
respomimt €01' ciismiswl vizw
ar the hxxnourahle as nriminal case,
the fimimgs 013 mm m cf
facts md p mceed:h1gs cmmwy tea
the cf the me is whcxlly oppcesed
:3 the Cam E: 2606 Am saw 22:39
aha «mm mm: an zxmm-we acqmal
V Cam, 110 sthaz Tlibunal cs: aathority can
L ¥ to the memwepmmx enquiry
% x _ ha§e:1:§f2:2id;amw?a1 facts afi citrctzmstmice 'mum the evidwe
3 " asmms who at mmmmm: mimana1pmmangg ms
inthis wfl mfimmfimpmmbfifimmyw
S
E
5
P
E
E
5
§
§
§
§
3
E
§
§
§;
§i
S
3
§
3
E
Q
E3
5-3
§
§
§
EE
§
K
§
fig
§
fis
fig
ZQ
$
§
§
2§€)'?_
Q
this Cam, the W }:m hem igbarcd by new %
befcrre the firstrespondent, it is mg
Mflfiwfififi %’*%E€%w?H awasm” %fiz.%%’«w.5§%Kfih Wfififi fii
Q
;«»s
g
3
3
E
§
3;
E
ii
3
§
£2
§
§
3
.3
Q
§
§
§
§
E
E
E
is
3
§ ‘
E ” ._
§
§
%
§
§
§
3
E
E
,9?
at
3. The lwned Savior: Afivucme Shri Rgimfla
fm Eh: {Emma} ferthc pctziiimweuld .._ V
am? by the am, am no fi1rthz:rac’r;h3n hm hem 2
first rewrfiemt pursmi tn: the IEPGIL V
writ. mm mm been mm
likely ta: he diamissed
abaui. Amorfikigly, the 39 315
m is my
unlawful acti<:1j._ cmmry $0 the
Sd/a-I