High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Prakash Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 15 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Prakash Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 15 September, 2011
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Cr.Misc. No.30417 of 2011
                                  Prakash Yadav S/o Ramjee Yadav
                                                 Versus
                                         The State Of Bihar
                                               -----------

2. 15.9.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-

B)A, 26 of the Arms Act.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody since

1.10.2010 for recovery of arms and has allegedly stolen auto

rickshaw but there is no proof of the same, let the petitioner

above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court

concerned to the satisfaction of Sri T.A. Kumar, J.M., Birpur in

connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.59 of 2010, subject

to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be Prabhas

Yadav, brother of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a

close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The

bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about

any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor

shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of

similar nature after his release in the present case and
-2-

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive

the police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and

delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

In view of the nature of allegations, the petitioner is

directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Supaul

within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and

every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The

conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period

by the superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found

wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court

concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of

bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the

Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the

petitioner before the court concerned.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )