High Court Karnataka High Court

Puttasidda vs Vijayalakshmi Prasad on 29 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Puttasidda vs Vijayalakshmi Prasad on 29 October, 2009
Author: N.K.Patil And K.N.Keshavanarayana


” “””‘ ‘3’?!’ ‘fl\I¥I\’ LII I’f’If\I’l’\Il”\E\l’\ EIEQIE V-sVuF\uIl’\’ LII I\l”II\l”f’HIl”‘II\f””! “Il\III HIVAIVJI’

mm wa m mm uzs 173(1) 01? RV Agffifiaamm

THE JlmGHEliT Am) AWARD DATED: 9.1 memfsVv

E9′ mm m. 1345/zoos 027 mm mm 342:?
ADI3L.DI3T.JUDGE ARI) Hactgn, FARTLY.
Mme mg cram PE’l.’I’1’32<I)!!"'I?C}1i§ GQ3%[I*'_fi..'HSATI9.H ij

ARE smrmm mmancmmm cg? cmaarmfiaawzozq;-%%L

mm APPEAL conmieiimt FéR.fiE5§m€3 I}AY3

11.1.:-an-1-2:. 3., DELIVERED ma;

We WW by the
Nfit pasaeé in MVC

T xo.1s4a;2oe5 me Aaainamm Illistzrict

Jtzdgc & I$:.’1”,- referred to as
£92: bcrevfiy} has wanted this

of oeompensatfian. The

its ané award Ems

W rdéé’ a; Ra.++,eoo;~ with inmm: at 3% pa.

apmfim;-at’; cfahn of Rs.5,fi§,{‘.lE£f«~ an

_&;£i::e§i:=.!£it’ ‘cf mm ‘ auataim in the road haw

‘I’haa appeflant ha gutted thh apfil an

gonna that tm ammmt awarded by the Chm

‘I’z+%x&iainadaqua1aaa.xfi11eisan1:it1.zsé&r

“*”‘H’!-*- ‘F-WV”! ‘IF! I’|l”II”ll’Il’-“IIl”II\l””\ III\l’Ii-\u\f’ltll\.I VII I’!-I’l(ll3’Ifl”IIul”I!\l”\ I’ll\il’I ‘lam-r\aI\I Mar l\l”‘!W\lWJ”1Ir’Il\r1 -uru..vu-2–u–nu-wpum

with intmmt at 3% p.a. sum the dam zaf

data ef t.

oompexmfiaon an
by the exam; the saw

Ccmpany
of t’mv.-z.

leerfi enamel fir tha appellant

%% fiilxat, 1:114: exams Tribunal has same: ta

X appa-ggsamrheammaaaviaammm-a. mam:
mam limb dhabflity at 50% am mm is

‘ Hraasu-£::fi:n:1’1.rzthem%:aaxt<:frig1nl:9ga1fidneteth7n,

he aanmrt walk without erutahw am 02.11? wfiht, sit
pu::pm'1yam.§ Thhaspectofflmmathariarmtmkm
tits wmfidaafiufi by the Chm Triburzal. In aim? at'

tlw auamiwd, aim

"¢.r–«-"

i
L

– -‘kiI”uu’r’I -on-run inwyrinf-II ‘~17! tI’M’1o1t’r’Inr’ln1a-n nnninvtu infirm-uuv

‘I’ri’bunaI failad ts appraciate um pain

wcmld have sufiered during the long

ha-mg Mara to the fizzjtzxiee 3 A

The doctaor has

said to be pcrxnaxmnt in by 3;
the whoa body meg aspect of
tha mm: has am: by rm claims
to have awardad
just and pain am
sufimfi . aozxidserafiozz,
we deem it – towards “pain and
‘V as i-“§:as.$,{W/~ awarded by 1&2
_____ ..

9; the exam Tribunal has met

‘ ” fiawarda “anmw’a.:°xw§ nrcxtzx-Qshim

A enargw. mmmazy, mm apwzant
m 545 days. In my mm1,rm might

apesnt 1-aawble amunt tawands aorzveyam,

and and attendant czhargm. Tm Claim

‘I’riZbw1 ha awardad anly a sum ef Rsg1,3m;-
mwards atmadam sharfi mxi mt awazfifi any

»_M__WM_/w__,_…

Z W

sounruu –w—–.. v. …__.___..

“””””””,.-“‘V_’ “””””””\l-|”|?l’| l’lI\’I’| ‘4.-\JIJKl K)!’ RJHKIVHIMRH l’ll\7E”1 \.o’|JiJI\l VI I1″!-!\I’I”IIW’V”-”
= 2

amount towards caonwyame and

‘iherfiore, am 5.15% it fl to award

txameyanoe. murfihing faod T_

10. I-iowemr, 2′ L’

‘mam’ Imp%es’ i V and the exam
dam mt 5 nfthis Cmxrt.

11% has mmivwd W in
&(&.2,5m;w» p.m. x 3 mum)
dutim period at’ umtmaeut”

?mdequn1ae and in our optimism,

ma£m,weamm’nr¢m take
am appellant @ 33.39902. pm. am

as mm: Ra.?,50flI- awazfiai by

‘ Tribum wards: “has at’ mmm’ durm’ tha

‘§@¥ndafu-m’bn%’.

1:2. Fx1rthm*,theTr%1mz1&redin.a1a¥a1’eIE:ng enly
Rs.5,0BO[«- tmimrés ‘km: of Bs ami
wftmut tamm info cermifimwn fha dtxrafinn at
mm%tum% flm&ppa@ &rfifi&a§maxfia

surgmy tandmom far the fi’acmre asf m

due w thin, xmmm eftlm same is
eaxmt walk without 7.

the h’x.’ycle or any k’

are not bahead kite near’ Claimfi
‘I’rihuna1. 50%
aaabmty to his body aisabfiity
mm tr; am mm af
to sufihr throughout
his a sum of #,flI9l-

as by me: clam Tribunal

§:3.%%% the mm Tribunal km awardad
ef Ra.20,mQ’=- twards ‘future: kw cf

fer tin: mam that am @3315

.:§wa3agedabout35ywx’sa$am.t1’medata¢.:fa.cu5dma&

Imwasavegtabkvsmétm ‘1’1maecfiéar:.tmrr&k1
tbs-.:ywr2CflO. %&rgwemnsa£e.1ytal:aa tm
hmxm 9f the appammt at m..3,ow- pm? manta.

&xmthea wuqfi3Symm,fimgvpa’
__”_”_fl__#….’.:

5

9.11.mo5 passed by me claim

mm 39434512905 T3 hmby

appellant ‘w entitled to ‘Qf T V

(total exmanoema: bemg %%j1§[;.3,,45;:aeof;Q-3 with
mmm at 6% pa. from
the dam cf petijflon 9:?

‘rm%k % Company in
aompmzsawn wfih
k%a£ix wesalm fir-om. the date of

recafitof a. cgpyoi;

n, a sum of

shame M

as m’ Scheciflfi bank

vibe appfianxfior an pefied of fiveymrs
by Eve yuan, w1th’ mm gm m

Tim %.’tn’111g @1111: of RX4-5,%Q- with
mats: Katmai: shallha fiswin fam at’ rm

l’lI\Jl”l uvunl vi Iv-snnuanun-u–q -unuu u–…… _. .. …. .. _

‘A’… ‘f’ -v-nnnannn ruurl uumlu Ur nnnmninnn

appellant an deposit of the amtmt by me ~ V.

(tawny.