High Court Karnataka High Court

R Ragavendra @ Raghu vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
R Ragavendra @ Raghu vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh


._……….n….. mm s._uu,_xr or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA men coum or KARNATAKA man comm or KARNATAKA men»: c

Kg 3 REQH $333? Q? iifiHfi?%K§ Q? §%§§%$§RE
§§?§§ @335 Egg 2″ 3&3 Q? $$?$§EE; 2§§§

Efififififi

$23 fiQ§’§EE §R.J§8T§$§ Bfi;§vg§:f§ Eéfi£5fi”«

saxxzfigz §E?:?:@§’§§g§:§5§2@§§<;_w,I
fififififififi

E aggavgxfigg E Efifififi gfsgyggga *

a.X& 23 $35; R§Q*fi%R§E§LRE fig?

xaL:y&fig €ax§1g<~..'L?{; ']¥f*

sgggszz, K§§3§8§AJ§§g?'§ ya;-3,;

§§§§: §ISERE$? ,""~ ' ".' 1.,;'§§?:?:&§ER

{By 3337; ?§Kfi$§§§g:fi§§§ W
a§3_;_ %"'°
TH;§§g2§"§§jggg§§fAKa
as? 3§4@a$%3§§§§§§:.=

§SEE$E,§?$TE$§ "A:

3§§§%g§§$_V-e A ” fig, RE$§$§§E:&

‘ *.A i€$gv5::; a ? §§%R§EE5fi§%g §£$§ 2

“”§§L;%”‘ $3233 ‘$;$§§3§ a2,§,g 23 ?g

‘§§v@§&?§’§@& TEE ?§@zr:@§gg ?Rfi?E§$ TEE? TEES

§~§:;;:%~;§*”3§.;§ £$¥RT 3&3 EE mgasgfi “Si”? ggzmsg Em
§E?ET§fi§E§ $§* 3&3; 2% agggg §$*:34;§? sg

.” 3§§g§§a*§§: §§§:$§ $$aT:§§§ 3% ffifi Qgfigggz
‘ §§3!g.3$§§ Qgigzgfiifii §£% 3% Q? :§$,

%””

nun uuunx ur I\f’Il\I’.l”Il!’\l\l”\ nlvn uyiifnl wr IMHKNEIII-\I\l\ HIUH LUUKI U!” KAKNA|”AKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARMATAKA HIGH L

Em}

?§’E§f”E’.?.”%’3}€ i’Lf§§§§;€§r§f* 5:523; §’i’I;E’?.. iZ’=f27’+:;?E ETEEES
Effifiaff, “$343 §§’fi£IF?§§ .§’e’f”..”:§..s§:.¢;i”‘.,?’-?£§Eé’=’zi’.§>:

flT?3 § EZEQ

Rwy =3. 5.

ffihé p§*;:3;%::Lr;;s:1%: has Ssrmghég_-“i<,%:::;ff.a*§':;ta:*::.:.: __:::§§

fiaii in $ana&$:i&m mith'$:im§3E§g:EéE"'

Bagavanagzgiié. E?'@1iz;*:e VS*:'=..;%f:.i£:=T::._ 'fiat
mffanaeg §uni3&a§iQ E§5£§–u$$€€$§E5 3&2; 2%:

§2§{§§ Efififi %i*§*$é§ti@fi 3§ ®§*:?§.

3, E? :5 §l£§§$&,t&at tkifi ggtitiaxgr ginfig

z.;:;;é:.€%: zmfi E:2§,.3:§<;*§. a :éa.g:a.t::;:;. Krazz ma

'.:&%e:'t§z$%i¥a3ag&m§fi:a whfiffiifi ihfiy xsmmitaafi

',Vfi§zé§$$,$fi ":h@ afiéagaaafil am&. algg Qh%ng§§§ tag

fiemégiafié $5 tfia %§§i:3%§

13?"

_…….. .,. .-m…w.».m mu!-I cgugr cs KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA men c<

é, %$§aréin§ fig éfig iaarngfi fififififiél ifiz ihé
§Eti§i§fi$E§ tha gaiitiaaez is a@% inxfilyéfi in
tfiia aafie gné ha hag fiééfi faiagiyfimfiiiéfifiéfi

in.:hi§ cage'

E. Ehé lgarnafi fiavéxamgnéxElaafiéigggfimittefi
tkfit the getitignsr 'afié athgzg Ewith ax
infiantiam fia tgxa1_&g§?{zéfig ¥Qhi$l§ had

cmfispizefi 3% ¢&$m:%fm§:§$§'§€ fiha fificeaaaé nfi

ahafigafi the mam%§E$§3.¢§1t§e_§@fi:é£%}

éfi fiavifig _-xégaxfih k§;,– fifig Eacta ad

cizaamatamsaa Q§'%§§ $§£§; fiifififi alzéafiy the

éggs ig{ géndiag. fax. tziaig 1: £3 fa: tag

§$ti%i23%:'§£?*§za$$ fa: $§xiy" tgial if 5%

afivifigfig;"" @§£fi§&§ingiy; the §@iit:&x £5

§,é§§;&s.*

VF[§ifi§§5§§ $f$ '"

Sd/-‘
JUDGE