R. Pushpa vs The State Of Kerala on 19 January, 2007

0
48
Kerala High Court
R. Pushpa vs The State Of Kerala on 19 January, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 33882 of 2006(H)


1. R. PUSHPA, W/O.SABARIMUTHU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.SUGATHAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

 Dated :19/01/2007

 O R D E R
                          K.K. DENESAN, J.



                    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

                     W.P.(C) No.33882 OF 2006 H

                    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =



               Dated this the 19th January, 2007



                          J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is working as Part-time Sweeper on

daily wages. She has filed application for

regularisation of her service and for pay and

allowances at the rate applicable to regular employees

in terms of the Government Orders on the subject.

Facts necessary for consideration of the claim of the

petitioner have been stated by her in Ext. P4

representation filed before the 1st respondent. The

Executive Engineer (Respondent No. 3) as per Ext. P3

has written to the Superintending Engineer about the

need for having one more post of Part-time Sweeper in

the P.W.D. Building Section.

2. Government is the competent authority to

create or sanction posts of Part-time Sweepers and also

to pass orders regularising the service of the

incumbents working in the various government

departments as per Govt. Order dated 25-11-2005. It

is, therefore, only just and proper that Ext. P4

representation filed by the petitioner is taken up for

WPC No.33882 /2006 -2-

consideration along with Ext. P3 letter and other

particulars furnished by the subordinate engineers.

Government shall pass orders on Ext. P4 in accordance

with law within two months from the date of receipt of

a copy of the judgment along with the copy of the writ

petition. Until orders are passed on Ext. P4, status

quo as it obtains today shall continue, as far as the

petitioner is concerned.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

K.K. DENESAN

JUDGE

jan/

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here