High Court Kerala High Court

R.Sivasankara Pillai vs Neelakanta Pillai on 28 May, 2010

Kerala High Court
R.Sivasankara Pillai vs Neelakanta Pillai on 28 May, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MFA.No. 156 of 2008()


1. R.SIVASANKARA PILLAI, S/O.RAMAN PILLAI
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. NEELAKANTA PILLAI, 75 YEARS
                       ...       Respondent

2. GOVINDA PILLAI, AGED 75 YEARS,

3. LAKSHMIKUTTY PILLAI THANKACHI,

4. GOURI KUTTY PILLAI THANKACHI,

5. UNNI KRISHNA PILLAI,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI

 Dated :28/05/2010

 O R D E R
                   A.K. BASHEER & P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ.

            ------------------------------------------------------

                            M.F.A. 156 of 2008

            ------------------------------------------------------

                          Dated: MAY 28, 2010

                                  JUDGMENT

Basheer, J.

When this appeal is taken up for consideration, learned counsel

for the respondents has raised a preliminary objection regarding the

maintainability of this appeal before this court. He invites our attention

to the proviso to sub-sec.(2) of sec.388 of the Indian Succession Act,

1925 in this regard. A perusal of the provisions contained in sec.384

read with the proviso referred to above will undoubtedly show that

there is considerable merit in the above contention.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is prepared

to take back the records and present the appeal before the appropriate

court. His only request is that he may be granted some reasonable

time to do so in view of the ailment of the appellants who are now

prosecuting the case after the death of the original appellant.

3. There is no dispute that this appeal had been presented

before this court within the time prescribed under law. Therefore we

are satisfied that the above prayer is only just and reasonable and can

M.F.A. 156 of 2008
2

be allowed. We do so.

4. The Registry shall return the appeal documents to the

learned counsel for the appellant for presentation before the proper

court. If the appeal is presented before the court concerned within

three weeks from today, the said court shall entertain the appeal

ignoring the delay and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE

mt/-