IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.39624 of 2010
RAKESH KUMAR
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2. 03.11.10. Heard learned counsels for the
petitioner, informant and the State.
The petitioner being the husband is
languishing in custody since 02.08.2010 in a
case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 504,
506/34 of the I.P.C.
It is alleged that the petitioner was
married to the informant in the year 2005. It is
submitted that when the petitioner got the
compassionate appointment after death of his
father this frivolous case was lodged. Initially
the marriage was performed under pressure.
Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan learned counsel
appearing for the informant submits that the
petitioner after five years of the marriage has
alleged the performance of the marriage under
pressure. The informant is still ready to resume
the conjugal life, which also gets reflected
from the impugned order. The petitioner is not
ready for resumption of conjugal life.
The petitioner i.e., the husband is
willing to pay Rs. 1,000/-(One Thousand) per
2
month to the informant. The aforesaid amount
will be deposited in the account of the
informant in the first week of every month from
December, 2010. The informant will supply the
account number to the petitioner within a period
of one week from today.
The aforesaid payment by the petitioner
will be subject to any order being passed in the
matrimonial, maintenance or reconciliation
proceedings between the parties.
Considering the aforesaid submissions,
let the petitioner above named be released on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.
Jamui in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No.
164 of 2010.
On failure to make payment
consecutively for three months will give liberty
to the informant to file an application for
cancellation of bail.
U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)