High Court Karnataka High Court

Satish Kumar B C vs Prathima M on 3 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Satish Kumar B C vs Prathima M on 3 November, 2010
Author: Jawad Rahim


‘3

RE 33% §’§€}Z’i mam §F §i£R§f§:%.Tfi§§.&, B.é’s§Q£.§.QRE

mama Trfig Tm. ardf my Q?’ sgavamask 251~:3f* Q

B§Ffi§§

*m I+§Q§’BLE 1&#m.J¥.IS’I’i$Eg§fi(i»’fi§ A’

RFF€ NQJG Q? 256»? z T
B 3% : V

SR.LB.CySATE%H mmg .–
Sm LATE B§1€.{i1§iE%”§§’.§:E*%’E5%?’i ;
aagzagfi ”

Rig. §F?’Ez”.’;E GF”E’§+m; fiS8″£”.__ V
Eymavfivm E1w§ssfj2’12:_;R _’ ” _ –
Mifiilfi §I\¥E3I(}}§i§ ”

Kfifififilfikifi—‘;3¥;Sj*§R3G’*§; mam
New Ki’ :3; Q A3SS%;?;f§; ;g;$c£r;:*m%
EBEQEJEER, <:m~:;., §:;:a:;ma. — '
EAEBGRTAEEK mmmafim

av afiiwsfi %m:;' ::.§;BsE:€T;

" …..

5535?’, fig; ” — .

W} :3 FB3,E1;?:;.S§’:?f:$1«3′..

. mm
9.53; 33

. Rghfi

am, 51% swag

% ” ” ~ r1¢’.3;2s;&, §3?7–§’I,GQR§ mfimmga §R.EI$P”C1KEEE¥T

% am am may awzm mg; g: Fmuy
T Qnzm fiat afimt fine J t éafimi 1§.*3.Q{}fl’§
in E¥{.C.§a1′?¢’?{2i..’fl5= an the ffia fif the Fri

;)’g3&g’5s Family cam,

§?mm3mai.mg ms petiiiaan

-“Ia
gr

mafia” mama 13{i}§ia} & (1; effi.§s§.As”£ far aiwm.

‘§7m yefitéan an Ear mxtiem fiia day; 1%
Cfilifi mafia iha fzrziitgwifi:
0*”

V ci£§§@§§g§§”:*;-§§

agnan

Ifimeszi camma} fmf {Em pafifigfifi E: 5 u

perusafi sf {Em arder shfi arfi

this 319?’: hm mm gm: m’;::im§*_’?St;;s %

I9 :3? the Eeugm’ aa

23 ?s.« aefikfig aueptai.
Fhtitiengr is _g;.’m::%&é%;*§’ RPFQ as a
_,S:=;.:::fi::m §.’3{i§ mi’ tins Fmfiy
Gszgis’ £{:’=t. _

Far this RF’§’€ 3&3}; atanfi;

Sci] 1%
Iudge