IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.10843 of 2010
RAM UDGAR YADAV, S/o Jugul Lal Yadav, R/o Village-Hataha,
P.S.-Bahera, District-Darbhanga.
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.
2. Most. Manjula Devi, W/o Late Sitaram Yadav,
R/o Village-Mohiuddinpur Pakri, P.S.-Bahera, District-Darbhanga.
-----------
02. 07.12.2010 The petitioners has sought quashing of the order
dated 11.02.2010 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge,
Darbhanga in Cr. Rev. No. 296 of 2007 by which he has
affirmed the order dated 28.06.2007 passed by Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate in Bahera P.S. Case No. 174 of 2006.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the
order of cognizance the ACJM has considered the protest
petition therefore the order of cognizance is bad.
However, on going through the impugned order, I find
that he has applied his judicial mind to the facts of the case
and, therefore, this can not be the sole ground for setting aside
the order. The application is dismissed.
The District & Sessions Judge, Darbhanga is directed
to ensure that no criminal revisions are kept pending for long
periods since in the present case I find that even though the
revision was filed in the year 2007 final orders were passed in
the year 2010 only delaying the trial unnecessarily.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-