High Court Kerala High Court

Raveendran Kalpathodi vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2010

Kerala High Court
Raveendran Kalpathodi vs The State Of Kerala on 7 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34529 of 2010(M)


1. RAVEENDRAN KALPATHODI, S/O.
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATIONS,

3. THE SUB REGISTRAR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU S. NAIR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :07/12/2010

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

            ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                W.P.(C) No. 34529 of 2010 M
            ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
         Dated this the 7th day of December, 2010

                           J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is working as a Scribe in the office of a

document writer. Ext.P1 issued on 02-07-2002 is the licence

granted to him. The Kerala Document Writers’ Licence Rules,

1960 was amended with effect from 07-09-2000, providing

minimum qualification of SSLC for granting licence.

Subsequently, Ext.P2 notification was issued, enabling the

Scribes, who were licenced till 07-09-2000 to appear for the

examination, however, relaxing the qualification of SSLC. For

the reason that the petitioner’s Scribe licence was granted

only on 02-07-2002, he is ineligible for the benefit of Ext.P2.

2. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition has

been filed, seeking to quash Ext.P2 to the extent the cut off

date on 07-09-2000 has been prescribed. Petitioner also

seeks to quash Ext.P5, whereby his request for permitting him

to appear for the examination has been rejected.

W.P.(C) No.34529/10
: 2 :

Consequently, he also seeks a direction to the respondent to

admit him for the test scheduled in pursuance to Ext.P2.

3. The fate of this litigation will depend upon the

validity of the cut off date 07-09-2000 prescribed in Ext.P2

and if the said date is not an irrational one and is upheld,

petitioner cannot seek any relief in this writ petition.

Therefore, case was adjourned with a direction to the learned

Government Pleader to obtain instructions about the

relevance of the date 07-09-2000 prescribed in Ext.P2.

Accordingly, learned Government Pleader has obtained

instructions and submits that, with effect from 07-09-2000, the

aforesaid Rules were amended and the educational

qualifications were introduced to be licenced as a document

writer. It is stated that it was therefore that the Government

have decided to relax the qualifications for Scribes who were

licenced as on 07-09-2000.

4. In my view, having regard to the facts disclosed by

the learned Government Pleader, it cannot be said that the

W.P.(C) No.34529/10
: 3 :

date 07-09-2000 is an irrational one to be called arbitrary and

interfered with by this Court in this writ petition.

Writ petition fails and it is dismissed.

Sd/-

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
aks

// True Copy //

P.A. To Judge