Gujarat High Court High Court

Rathod vs District on 21 January, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Rathod vs District on 21 January, 2010
Author: Mr.S.J.Mukhopadhaya,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Dave,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/429/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY No. 429 of 2010
 

with
 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 1446 of 2008
 

In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 22464 of 2007
 

 
 
=============================================


 

RATHOD
FAKIR MOHAMMAD RASULBHAI - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

DISTRICT
SUPPLY OFFICER & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=============================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
IQBAL M MALIK for Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR AJ DESAI AGP for
Respondent(s) : 1-3, 
=============================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 21/01/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA)

Though
Civil Application for condonation of delay was listed along with
Letters Patent Appeal (stamp), but as short question of law is
involved, we have heard both the Civil Application and Letters Patent
Appeal on merits.

From
the record it appears that the licence of petitioner to run a fair
price shop was cancelled having found different irregularities. After
inspection, it was found that the petitioner though did not
distribute the foodgrains to the card-holders but shown them to have
distributed. The said cancellation of licence having been
challenged, was confirmed by the appellate and revisional
authorities. Therefore, the petitioner moved before this Court in a
writ petition being Special Civil Application No.18612 of 2007, but
the Counsel having failed to impress the Court, without reserving
liberty, sought permission to withdraw the petition on 26.07.2007.
Subsequently, another writ petition being Special Civil Application
No.22464 of 2007 for same relief was preferred, which having been
dismissed on the ground that the second writ petition is not
maintainable, present appeal has been preferred.

Having
heard Mr. I.M. Malik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
appellant and Mr. A.J. Desai, learned A.G.P. for the State, we are
not inclined to entertain the appeal.

Accordingly,
both Civil Application and Letters Patent Appeal (Stamp) No.1446 of
2008 are dismissed. No costs.

[S.J.Mukhopadhaya,
C.J.]

[Anant S. Dave, J.]

*pvv

   

Top