-1-
IN THE men comm' OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 27'"! DAY OF MAY 2009 VA
BEFORE H 1' V "
THE HODFBLE MR.JUS'I"}CE SUBHASH'v:B¥5[§AI::* "
cmmxm. PETITION r§6;-fig' *~s1:"'_2_.,t__);*i3_,§:j: _
BETWEEN: A' .
S.M.I3asappa
S/o S.P.Ma.ha:;ievappa
Kanoor Village and Post
Srimangala Hobli, ~_
Kodagu District. _ " -. .. PE'I'i'I'i0NER
(By Sri.T.A.Kun1m1baiah jar. .4
Ms.p.c.vinitha,?_Ad*§x~s;) '
AND: K
S/o.Srinivasa;
49 years > _ .
Working as Accountant.'
Canara Bank, u %ki{t:%i:,1r
South. --~---- 557.1216. V .. RESPONDENT
V. {By Karanth Kamath 85
Kgxmath Law Assta, Advs. )
‘ .._}i’his.{§1’i;§t~;£ii1a} Petition. is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
— prayifig t6 Adift-‘ct the Add}. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn,) 8:. JMFC Virajpet to
Vdispase ‘C.C.No. 1078/O6 Within a ape-cificd period.
‘F_his Petitisn coming on for Admission, this day, the Couxt
the following:
3 §n$ta1*fia_éntfs~e,.A Comp H
-2-
0 _8_ D E E .
?et:itioner has sought for a direction to of
C. C.No. 1078/2006 pending on the file ofJ.M.F.C., f _
2. Learned Counsel for the petifioner ”
matter has been pending since 2003 arlido.
against the respondent is: puniéhflole
with Section 142 of the Negotiable
3. On the czontrary, the respondent
submits that, he out of the claim
amount. is the balance
amount
4. oretitioner submits that, since
2005, the nifitfef .i_s} penfiing and payments axe made in
‘Vt being agxicuiturdst, it is dificult for
Dfiecoxding to respondent, he claims that he is
an
5. Consideydng the rival contentions ané also considering
it is suffice if the matter could be disposed of granting
time to the respondent to pay the amount, as he is not
_ ‘4″n.iiep1It:ing the claim. Learned Counsel for the petitioner though
opposes! for granting of time. at the request of the leameé
,3
~:%:”:__
-3-
Counsel for the respondent, six months’ time is gxanteei to
the amount. in cast: balance amount is not paid, A’
Magstratc is <:i1re' cted to take necessaxy steps and '
the matter accordingly.
BIRMI-