High Court Kerala High Court

S.Safiya Ummal vs The Accountant General on 10 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
S.Safiya Ummal vs The Accountant General on 10 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 16152 of 2007(W)


1. S.SAFIYA UMMAL, KARTHIKA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.D.SAJEEV

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :10/09/2007

 O R D E R
                                     V. GIRI , J
                         ==========================
                            W.P.(C) NO. 16152 OF 2007
                         ==========================
                   Dated this the 10th day of September, 2007.


                                    JUDGMENT

Petitioner’s husband P Ahammed Kabeer retired from service as Assistant

Sub Inspector of Police, on 31.10.2005. He expired on 18.11.2006. The

pensionary benefits including DCRG and commuted value of pension is yet to be

disbursed to his legal heirs.

2. On instructions, the learned Government Pleader submits that the

Accountant General has sanctioned the retirement benefits due and admissible

in favour of late Ahammed Kabeer as also the family pension which is due to the

legal heirs vide order dated 06.08.2007. The submission is recorded.

Necessary steps will be taken by the 3rd respondent- The Superintendent of

Police, Kollam to take consequential action and see that the retirement benefits

as due and admissible in favour of late Ahammed Kabeer, and now due to the

petitioner as his legal heir is disbursed within a period of two months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is open to the petitioner to produce

a copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent along with the appropriate

representation.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

V. GIRI, JUDGE.

rv