High Court Karnataka High Court

Sahadevappa S/O Hanamappa … vs Sangappa S/O Hanamappa Talawar on 28 May, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sahadevappa S/O Hanamappa … vs Sangappa S/O Hanamappa Talawar on 28 May, 2009
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
IN THE HIGH cou§<T OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 23*" DAY or MAY, 2009 S f ~

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASH{}K"'8--.,HIF'féZ'HviGf$i§§    A

WRIT PE'f"£"'¥'ION {V0.61156[2:€39,9_{§F§~C5?€;i  1 

BETWEEN:

1. SAHADEVAWA, S/0 HAw,mAPPA'TA;AwAR,
AGE: 73 YEARS, occ: AGRICLUTt}RE,:j_' ;   
R/O SHELAVADI «- 535 453, TALI: 1~aA*.iA§_GL1_N~:),~., 
QIST: DHARWAD.  - _ T 

2, MAHADEVAPPA, 'S,{0~.H,Q.hi;A_M$§PRA TALAWAR,

AGE: '71 YEARS, 0CC:'vAGRi:ULTuRE,

:2/0 SHELAVADI 53$ 4~s3,..,TA:;: NAVALGUND,

DIST: DHARWAD.  _  T :PE'lTl'IC)NERS
(EW SR1   $A11K3XIv---,--.ADVOCATE)

Aflfi;: "

 ,,,..,_sA:uT=;:=, S/O'.V*§éiA;*¥AMAPPA TALAWAR,
 AGE: 57  occ: A<sa1cuL.T:.:aE,
TTTTM; SHELAVAD2 -- sas 453,. TAL: NAVALGUND,

' " " '9'.IS.'lf":' DHARWAD.

'"*fjj,4,,":'(riEsP.69i2001. The Appellate Cee.rt'Lv~aliowed' "the. eppeai and
remanded the matter, as lt  rn<§_l*e:npportunity has to

be given to the reeg§en_dent"'toitzroseéexemizeelthe P.W.1. The

Appellate Ceurt  'the sides to co-eperate with

the Tea} Courtvforlthe"5peVed§r:'_;}i$posal of the remanded matter.
3.  ~T_lfie ren1_e'n'r:re7t§.'fo{§'to}1, the notice. Eut

$hen, the Trial Court has aifiowedftfhe.§anf:e'h§vrrre'h3: application, as

the arrzendyénerxt ciarificatory in nature. The
partktuiars of fhe!f::3,ctV:e etateci are sought te be supplied
£2.31.' the»43reep~enc¥e£it'.=--.ivvjhe amendment only furnishes the

cf'¥'a_{i§§eati_or;.,ee.te:fhe proceedings which have taken piece before

 thehhhresreeuey"Ce:ufie=;"v..anfi the mutation entries effected in the

 revenue'.4'i"e;co§f:éS;'.V Theee proceedings are also admitteé by the

h'h[p¢;:::¢;zrer:%7 vvtensiéering these aspects of tee matter, the "Erie:

 formed the View that the amendment in question

 v.ro1£'£d'Tno£ change the nature of the em: or aiter the cause of

 action,

353%



7. Altheugh the conduct of the respendent is 

is wanting, the Triai Court has allowed the

application. The Trial Court cannot be held t_ci~i--ee'j:at"~ii:ai.=.i;t 

taking the iiberai approach and conseqiiefntiy':'a"£i*e§vin'g_'_:A£i2e

amendment application. I the2'efoi*e_,_. do 

as far as the Trial Court's ordeuf=.._a'iiewin"g'---t_ifie': amendment
application is cancerned.
8. However, the petit'i'onei's' fV»cc:e'i'i~<;ei'~.ne--"'are else to be

addressed.  a*n.di--.vfo'i"'rioi--lapse on their part, the
petitioners lseéveittzéeperiylendment belatedly sought by
the respondentg'i"iiex'ainendlefient application is filed after 15
io--n.g_ yea»i'e,ef__lAthe filirigt :e._f..ti"ae suit. The ieng deiey of 6 years in

fiilri__g' the..wi*it;iien~.sl:etereent, not choosing to cross-examine the

 petiti'o'nei's,; 'filling the application fer recaliirsg the

Veeetitinneiis'..(§i%eii*itiffs') witnesses, filing the Civil Revision Fetitieri

; --...isVee.l§'i.eg'permission ti: cross~exareine the said witnesses but not

'A'-4'j~..c'i'oes§e;s<ai9ninirig them even on the ebteiriing of the permission ei

 '  tfieifilalnds of this Ceurt, making the amendment appiication after

 nears ef the passing of the remand order; etc., are too glaring to

fl8}«i



7

be ignored. Considering these asoects of the matter, _4It.Vé_Vaein it

necessary and just to confirm the Triai Courts order 3V§§.i'i'oi;§"i,jiji::g1'. the 

amendment appiicatton by imposing the foiiowingf'con£2i,ti'o:nvs; it  

(a)

(5)5 '

 3-tseeking theédfiournrnents Lznnecesoariiy.

 .. 

The respondent shat]. payA14′._an~.V_exeri9iv;3;iA

Rs.1s,ooo/- to the petivti:é~ner’sv.wit_hini:2 i°w§éksiAfrom”

the date of serving mraicoipgii;ss%:ms iordervjetther on
himseif or on hie ‘_;_The petitioners’
side serisfe co.o§?”.j_V~of_’ ‘tiiivis order on the

res;Songi”ent”‘o{ »h%s’j*–c”o–u_n}:eé1ja,opearing for htm in the

‘suit “pro¢eéd,i:ng§;’ ~ ‘ ‘

.. ‘ifi1eaufeas:Vponh€ieA:i’t entail not protract the proceedings by

Court shaii dispose of the suit as

.. ”’e;tpéd¥tious%y as possibie and in any case, within an

outer iimit of 4 months from today. If need be, the

Trio: Court shaii take up the case on daywto-ctay

basis.

flag

an; 2 Acre ‘V

i

(d) If the respondent defamts in depositing thg’T §dst of

Rs.15,00E}/- within the stipulated

benefit of amendment shaii not rgmai:If1’~.,a}1c<:::r%Jed

him.

The petition is dispcsed of Va,<.ft_:4_erdi4:'1g_lj';'.~-

JUDGE”

sac*