This Petifion coming on for Admission, this day, the Court’:
made the following:
GERBER
?€’£:§£i0ners have sought for quashing of tha
S.C.No.147/2007 (Crime M77/2006} cm the ..
Sessions Judge, Bangalom City.
2. Yeshwanthapura Poiic€ V_registe’1*E:dx a
No.7?/2006 on ‘?.3.2OG6 for u”cEen§_:e under
Sesction 306 IPC.
3. Compiainazité 0116 is the father of the
deccased, had taken firs: floor
premises mortgage, in gound floor, one
Lakshmidcvi; 2113: ciaughtsr Indrané. – petitioners
herein wfere $u::~sed to be qummi between the
tbs; of the comylainant. 013. 6.3.2006,
the house of the deceased (daughter) and
‘ VV .v.Vpacif.’ia:€I ifhe it is further aiicgad tliat, the complaéitlailfs
.;3.é21_;ghter c.~>:fi. ‘;?”‘.3.2Q€¥6 at about 9.30 am. haci gong to school to
Vh <é1'~,son. Hcwevar, smhoel authofifies at abeut 12.30 pm.
___fi§ofiacd the compiainant that, nobody had come to pick up 1111:?
" ' Ab us3:.1M <3f the dcctzased. As such, he went to the house of his
éaughtaer and found that, the house was lacked fmm inside and
ever: after shzeufing, she: did not open thtz dear and he was fumed
-5-
*2′. In my opinion, the contents of the complaint and the
material coliecttrd by the pmsecution, if they do not mai{c–“c:}1t a
case one under Section 336 $36, if there is
the accused even if the entire ailegafion in the M
as true, then no purpose would be gcriiied.
accused' It would be futile exer<:i$e.: '. ._ a merit in the case and the be aiioweé .
Accoxtiingly, the pefi1:ion’7 is proceedings
S.C.No.147/2097;*'(C:;fi :’1e l’;.§_(;,’Z’.?-:,i~’2.*0{)1S)’ffi_t;u1’z. _fg1i<§ file of Principal
Sessions Judge, Bangalore u
KNM/ ~. """