Loading...

Saju vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 17 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Saju vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 17 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3231 of 2009()


1. SAJU,AGED 33 YRS,S/O.ANTONY,CHIRAYATH
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SUNILKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :17/06/2009

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                    ---------------------------
                    B.A. No.3231 of 2009
                ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 17th day of June, 2009

                           O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under section

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the

accused in Crime No.312/2009 of Kodanadu Police Station.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under

Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. I have gone through the case diary. Taking into

account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of

the offence and other circumstances, I am of the view that

anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner. There will

be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner,

the officer in charge of the police station shall release him on

bail for a period of one month on his executing bond for

Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to

the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the

following conditions:

A) The petitioner shall report before the
investigating officer between 9 A.M and 11
A.M. on all Mondays, till the final report is filed

B.A. No.3231/ 2009
2

or until further orders;

B) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

C) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

D) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

E) On the expiry of the period mentioned above, the
petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate
concerned and seek regular bail.

F) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information