High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Narayanamma vs Smt Chennamma on 17 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Smt Narayanamma vs Smt Chennamma on 17 June, 2009
Author: A.S.Bopanna


4

§:}€iG§§~”, the piaintiffs aria bfifflffi this u3:i iI14,i\h§$ s3c011d

appeaj.

:2. Eiaard the imrlwd aiéixfisai Q}?-;

perufie-1:1 the appitai papmfs.

3. The t:2¢s€-gjsf Triai Caurt.

was that. {hfi Suit f;fv«r’§1§$&’}’rjfi&;5V0:igi:1aiij; bfilanged
{<3 the g;"&:§{i.n1e§§§Lé1'}' and their father
fiyiifiéfiedfid to '£113 $am€:. It

"e§'fi'.3"V'?{3],é.'jj1{?é3Li;";éé§.: fiaiizififs that '$316 plajnfifis aiang

'wi1{i1" fhré fi:'~S i;-. S€CQDd de:f&11da11t.s viz, Hl{)'[:{"1€}3

51151 $iz~:t,:;;3c:rtif:s V a3:;§:l—–ii: i:.hé3:t; ¢3m:1t.ex’t.w6r3.e:1tit1ed :0 3. 5112313 in

3 Wimn {hair Shams. were acxught, ‘£113

a3:r1éL i.§*:¥9;s zfiezaiad :0 {H1311} and it was candy at that

j’;;:;3é.:t.ur<=:, :31: piaimsiifs beaaznigi aware fiiat. tbs first

x i.'€1f3f6I}§flf1f, and Sennaiah jigaéiatiy had selé {ha pluperty in

qu<i3¥:i<3:'1 in fhfi fizird (i€f{':11(33.Z1'{'S husbaxid by sale dead

daieci 13.18.1953, Therefarfi, {ha piaénfiffs C(}1"11i".€I1d€:{1

$

"b

7

13:31 gift (7):: anaiysing the saié {§{}{3£11}1€I”fi,, {he Trial

€;”‘:0m’*{. has B1 f8.C’L7 has 113: :’€:1i(~:d an the Saiéi £i1.Q£’3′?’_¥’.§;i’3.”i€TE”}17

alone, bu? the Trig} Calm. if}”:€:1*€af€.$r rafezfisd-f§i’? éi:.§:i_%§r

d<::'1.m1t:r:t$ available on 1'(i€OI'{§ 3Qfi€1i'«€fa"£;;f1(i'; yihf Viiiidiizg '

0:" fatfe. that $113 piagintifi'-*5 havfi f:%§t,»1'2{i'thé"QAfii:$€:{ 2

that the pmpvértifis i.1"1"q{:$s:t.i0:1'~ vxm:'e: ._v jcéizit. fan1i1}:.

§"§i'(}}3€I'ii€S arzti that ihe1"wi:f{€i:"a5: they' 'énfgiilaci :0 a
share. "Phat: apa1't, ._fEj"ias naticed the fact
that at {ha peizfi wh§I1V–£§fE:iVC£": E§c§11niah acquired
in ¥;.E"}.;»:_:-j: §–.§:;3,"<#'é;::;'3§'5*:j:fi'»f'3i,4" §?a$. fh§: male: issue: and as
such ha €§f'€:':1_'}f;1 i1éLz?i§4_:é%:;_«:§§iir::%d *:1'ie entire prmpezffs 31161
that i§2'O11§_£§ "i';¥;;3;<:;{:, absi%.:f:: ijreperty. F’LB”f;h€:I’,
(i1,;:’i:”igt}’z@ §if§fi;«*.§.3″£::V€i>f hilnseif, ha hat} 303.5: fir:-5

g:;r{;Vp¢r%:y– §;:1 ‘ {:13-@$r:’_§:3:’1 zmder ‘fhfi 333:6 deed dajtérci
13’§–.18,L39i33 :§_:g§.hL1Sba11d 3? the ihirfi defendant who

* gsaga aiés’:;1:i;?§t:% the 53:11:: in fact has said <::3:r*'{'.ai;:1 extant, af

=";§i"a§s;*i'i:§§ jSu'bS€q:.1€:":tE§; an 15.6, 1966. 'E'h£r€:f9}:€§

C£:;§$i£i£%§if.§g §hesé 8.$pf:Q'£,S 0f" the I3C'1ai'€,£'i':1', {ha Triai Caurt

J

0