IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.17192 of 2010
SANJEET KUMAR
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
------
3/ 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is
that petitioner is not a manufacturer rather selling the seized sattu in
name of the Company i.e. Pragati Chana Sattu which is not observed
injurious to health by Combined Food and Drug Laboratory,
Agamkuan, Patna.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
prayer of the petitioner is allowed.
In the event of arrest or surrender within one month
from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in
connection with G.O. 35 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid
down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C.
shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)