IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-29863 of 2008
Date of Decision: November 14, 2008
Sanjeev Ahuja
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Neeraj Bala
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
This petition challenges Order dated
16.10.2008 whereby an affidavit filed on behalf of
the respondent has been taken on record.
On a perusal of the order, I find that
it has been treated as a replication/ rejoinder to
the reply filed by the respondent (petitioner herein)
to the main application filed under Section 125
Cr.P.C.
Contention of learned counsel is that
the additional affidavit has changed the entire case
originally set up on behalf of the respondent.
I have considered the contention of
learned counsel.
The Trial Court would consider the
Crl. Misc. No. M-29863 of 2008 [2]
contents of the replication/ rejoinder including the
fact, if established, that substantial improvements
have been made by the respondent in the case
originally set up.
No ground for interference is made out.
The petition is disposed of with the
above observations.
(AJAI LAMBA)
November 14, 2008 JUDGE
avin