IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 33634 of 2008(D)
1. VALSA K.K.
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER
... Respondent
2. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
For Petitioner :SRI.K.G.UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
Dated :14/11/2008
O R D E R
K.M. JOSEPH, J.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
W.P.(C) No. 33634 OF 2008 D
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 14th day of November, 2008
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner challenges Ext.P7. Petitioner has preferred
Ext.P8 objection apparently taking note of the wording of Ext.P7
that it is a provisional invoice. Learned standing counsel points
out that actually it is not a provisional invoice as such but it is a
short assessment bill. He points out that the petitioner can either
approach the Executive Engineer or the Consumer Grievance
Redressal Forum. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of as
follows.
If the petitioner prefers a petition before the Consumer
Grievance Redressal Forum, Ernakulam, within one week from
today, the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Ernakulam will
look into the petition and take a decision thereon, after affording
an opportunity for hearing to the petitioner, within two months from
the date of filing of the petition. Till such decision is taken, there
will be no disconnection pursuant to Ext.P7 bill.
(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
aks