Sanju @ Sanjiv S/O Shashappa … vs Kumari Jayasri D/O Kareppa Bagali on 22 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sanju @ Sanjiv S/O Shashappa … vs Kumari Jayasri D/O Kareppa Bagali on 22 September, 2010
Author: N.Kumar And Adi
1

IN 'I'I---IE I"-IIGETI COU RT OF IQ\RI\IA'.II'AKA
CIRCUIT BIZ-NCI"I AT GUI..,I3ARGA

DATEI3 THIS THEE 22*" ID}-XY OF SIEI"I'EMIII3ER, 20__I O

PI"{.E*ISI:IZN'I'

THE I~1ON'BI.E MR.JUS'FICE N.I{U§VI--uAI{  I" I

AND   -

THE HON'I:3LE MR. JU$'I'1C§LSIfiiIBIIiAS'I'{III£3

M.F.A.NO.3O18~1__IIO.I?'   
BE'I"WEF,N II I I I'
1.

SANJII SANJ IV

s/0 S}–IASHAPPA PUJARI
AGE:2O

occzmr, I

I2/(>:’1’c:r2v1,«. _ A 1; – V

“Pg 8: 1531s’1f:13I{s;.x;9U_}2 _ « .. AI3I’EI.I.AN’I’
(By Sri. In p ‘z-x_MBr«; Ak’.1§’c>(:~A’1’Ia)

ANI): . I

I’ ._ 1 . – IIVl.~\,._RI £3}–1-E’i’I

I)/O 1<.AR;:1})1=A_ I-BAG/-\I.]

' .Mf;i»:.- :1 '

I c;<:<::INv:.1;;~~… "

II”~?.I*3II’¥ ID : B #1: =; 1:312 IN,r\-TU RAL 1-~’A”1’§ -E ER AS

1412:}; 1\/§iVN{)fFI{‘..-1}UARDIAN.

KAm;1′>i-DA as/0 NAG/-XPPA

I r.3A(:A:,.1,.L2x(;13:52.

H nC><:(::A(j;R1,R/0:13As.r\NA1,
.;'\I(')\*.-7 AT Ir{()'I'E\EA.I,.

I ._’II_C}:’INI)I IN ST: I?>[JAII’I.J’ R . . I.-I{ICSI–‘ON I”)I€§\§’I’

.–TI{lI3y SH. SIII’\5;\SI’I1\I\3Ki\.I¥2 II §\r’IA.§\’N{}R. AI)V(I)C./\’lI’I§)

E
:5 //IIII

3
{(7) The plair1I’g'[/’ rllcxy be permi£.l.ci Le cznlenci. the
plain! as and milera zifeels r2ec?z’:ss(1ry.
(cl) Aug; other reliefs u.~lu’.el1 Ilozfble Courf. ciec’i.:l15sef]E’l.

be granted i.r’1_ft1L2ou:” of pIafn1f[)”1ui U1 c:je;s”-:’..’_j . L”

4. 111 the mem01’211’1d11m of 1’31;-rim. lT”‘:s’.?…'<1"

V' £110.

there is no 111211’1’iag___§e between l’;_iI11,.2=1e.1A1fj(.l 71:§l1.e” ‘cle’l*en.edz;uA1£’.f

amd the deferldant. falsely=ee.1j1t’e11(ii.g1g t.l1e.i.’;” ;§}.1e ll’1e

legally wedded wife of the l_’t.’l1e1vfe’f()re he

seugl’1t; for the aforesaiclfl*eAliel’s2{_’ 1 ll

5. [)efe11d2-1111. :fi’l(:-rel:”dVe*t’.;1’i.le(l.V~_y§?rjl.fe11 st:.atement.

e()nt.e§§fifig”el,1.i’e e’l:é:g1’V1′:’1l”‘~. ‘e'(‘m’f.en(1ed t;l1ai’. the plaintiff

married. the c1e1″eh:daLI1.t;.'”a.l§Q1.1i. 12 years back when both

of them l’v.ze1′(:Vr11i11~:V)rsfil in the year 2005 they l1EiVC

V’ , 211:4′-t}ii11ed ma}c)ri{‘.y;—thereafter as the plz1inl:ilT did not. take

‘ea.._19’ee. (:)’f_.tii#(l:’._Clefenclz111l., it resull.ed in several lit,ig;21t.ic)r1

l00__l.l’1 i1’1’*el_iV?il ancl criminal courts, t.l’1erel’ore, they

(:0I1tel’rd(3d, if the pla.i1’1t.il’l’ were to e01’1t:e1’1d filial he not

.111:{i1″‘1j.1’ie(.l the del’e1e1(.la1’1t, then the fiurlily eotlri. l’1e’1-8 110

jr11*is(li(:E,i()r1 to e:1T’e1’t.e51i1:1 the suit: a:11’1(.l. it. the civil ec.)urt.

\.vl’1iel1 11213 to c.leel:21.re, Elle sE.2-1l’.m_~: 01′ the pa-11’E§(–rs.

4

6. On the z1i'<)r(:s:;1i(i }i)1(E2}1CiiE'1§{S'§, the trial ("burnt

fmmecl the f()E1o\vir1g issues:

{1} W’hei:f1er defencicml proves Ulal. r’1’lC1I’T’i(1.:i’_jé3 ()’/.

pZc1ir1ig'[]’1.viti’1 the de/’enciam was (rL?l£?..’.3.f_'(./_i>i.eC:'”f2 V.

years bacic’.9′

{2} Whether d.efend.ant pr’L)Aves_:_ i’if;.c?£i.?T ,i34lcxi=.f1’é;’,[_;*fL”Cix}§Ii«

deferldarul led I’r1aIfr’iegi i§je’?_ “‘
{3} WheI”her course of {figs Suit?

{4} Whether _ 5Hiej»._ “pAla.i:1i§[T is not

mair1icu’r1abI.e? .

~VCL(:’){‘.li”‘I ‘f’:’1′.’V(;[(‘-5Vi1O’jL£f’iSdiCfi.Of’1 to try the

–_{6) VV.’1et.i1e.i– AA[;_I.;:ii.:”i:f;'[‘f’ is entitied jbr the reliefs
$Q]Ej’r*? V

‘ .( “1/1″/VI1’r}’.:vi”i:.~OI”CiC’I’ or decree?

7;*TF1’i:é% p1a1im:iff was (2×2′.1n1mec1 as PW’! and he

.’ .A1Z)IfOdL1’C-(..”Cl two documems as Exs. I31 and P2. On behalf

~i1h€ dCfcn(i12t1’1’L {:h:’ce xvimesses wort-? examined and

“f<e)1.1r (inE.:=; VVt”,1′(‘ {.)i”(.)(1’1.1{“.(,”‘,(} as I*3Xs.I)1 in D4. ‘l’1’1e

trial <':<')u1"¥;' 11213 1"1ei<.i ail the pi.t1E.s 2.1.5_,gai:1si the plaisitiff
3,

E;

,.

3
but in para 19, it has recorcled 2:2 (%z1i.c%g()i’i(ézi1 fii’1ding.,§

i.hz;ii:, the rciief claimed by the plainififf i.c., tg’)”~.r:ijec:iz.1rc

iihat, the dcferidzmt is not his rnzirricd \vife_–A”éi*s t.,1i'(-:3?”

not m.ar’riecl which has ‘£10 be.–rcj»ec&t,cc§ C)i1..”‘iiV1’14GVgvlT_(}.1If’i(i

that the fan1i.ly court has no jL1i’i’sdi’«::l_ioi1 ti: _Vg”i”~?1VIi..T. s.iji'<:.}'i";:1'

raver. V\/hen the court hasvnc 'ii1'i"sdici;–ioI'i_ tI"é:f"'i'r;:;1:ii: t.11<;~"

– , J . . {-3

reliefs mentioned 21b~f’)1f€, iihera-fh-rded eff ‘i’in’c’1~in’g; i.h2:itf;”Vii. has no jurisdiction to
CH[.C1′[‘.’21l’I1 «the ~SL.i’H;:_”£1_i1’d.__gg’;Ta1=1t the rehcfs sought for in the

plaini. any _finding’*.recorded by such a court on the

. oi:her:i’ssu-e alsofiifoiiid be one without jLirisdict,ior1.

if 1 *iie. court was right: in holding that: such 21

}.5i=ayer.~ez.iifi.riot. be g1’£-¥..I’liIC(i and the family court has no

AjL33’iS.(i3_(Zi’.iO’I] to grant: such 21 relief. “i’I1c.i’ci’orc, t:ho1.ig11 the

‘fi~naAi orc1e1′ of disinjssai proper azici tlriero is no

_..i1]cggaIiiy comniiiflicd by the trial court in €1j.<5n1issi1'ig the

suit", '(.11 {he same time, the i'iI'1c'1ing,;' I'eC..'(j)I'(;}€2(i on oi..l:1.e1-

(1

issi..1es sire liable to be $9! aside on the g1'i..:i’1c1 c.)l'”\y*ai1i’ of

jtlrisciiciicm. H€I1C<'3, we pass the following:

ORE) ER

'l'li.d

by the plai1it.iff before the :”«(l(A5.LlI”f. tj’l1C7

sought, for in the plaint, ‘is””~~:1c)t. itiE1ii’1tE1iVI1&i:§;3v1éVl”EIS l’,11€

family court had jtiriAstii0,.ii’e1i”air; g1’ziri*t’. ~ili_0 reliefs
souglit for. Thr-3 finding, :fe.'(:c5i*d5(:(i 0.11?’-oi.}.i1é:;_iss11es are also
set aside fQI””e&_’;1’_I.1′(. Qf j:.L3\1:’.l7’SdiVC”tZi”(_}i’I1VV.. iiowever, liberty is
reserved i’t’0 :’£ppél«Ifa_ri’t work out his remedy in
21(:c:oi”tI’eiili C6. }{4£riil1’7léi’axr_.’ ‘ ‘ » «V
No. co.st.s.– V
‘ Sdf”;

sa/Q
JUDGE

‘ ciini/i L

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *