High Court Kerala High Court

Santhosh Kumar M.R. vs The Manager on 12 February, 2009

Kerala High Court
Santhosh Kumar M.R. vs The Manager on 12 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 4661 of 2009(E)


1. SANTHOSH KUMAR M.R., AGED 33 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SARITHA C.S., AGED 24 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. THE MANAGER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.THIRUMALA P.K.MANI

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.S.DILIP, SC, SBT

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :12/02/2009

 O R D E R
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                  -------------------------------------------
                   W.P(C).No.4661 OF 2009
                  -------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 12th day of February, 2009


                              JUDGMENT

The petitioners availed a housing loan on 6.5.2005 with a

repayment period of 20 years. The EMI was Rs.4,342/-.

Repayment was not properly made. This led to the transaction

turning out to be sticky and it was accordingly classified as NPA.

Proceedings were initiated under the SARFAESI Act. Section 13

(2) notice was issued in July 2008. Petitioners state that they

live in the building constructed utilising the loan and that they

take care of their child and aged parents. These are normal

situations in any home. The petitioners also state that they had

to avail amounts on private loans to complete the building and

the second petitioner was unemployed while the first petitioner

works as a Make-up man. Whatever be the present situation of

the petitioners as stated above, all that they can aspire is to

request the bank to regularise the transaction which has already

been classified as NPA and seek for instalment facility to pay off

the defaulted amounts.

WPC.4661/09

Page numbers

The bank states that the total defaulted amounts plus

accruals thereon would be around Rs.2,50,000/-. It is

accordingly directed that distress action will stand suspended if

the petitioners pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- on or before

5.3.2009 and the remaining Rs.1,50,000/- by the end of the

current financial year itself. If such amounts are remitted,

distress action will be dropped and the bank will permit the

petitioners to continue to enjoy the facility. No other questions

raised. The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge.

kkb.13/2.