Sarfraj vs State Of U. P. on 8 January, 2010

Allahabad High Court
Sarfraj vs State Of U. P. on 8 January, 2010
Court No. - 51
Petitioner :- Sarfraj
Respondent :- State Of U. P.
Petitioner Counsel :- Dinesh Kumar Yadav,A. R. Nadiwal
Respondent Counsel :- Govt Advocate
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. and perused the

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is
innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that false
recovery of one knife has been shown from the possession of the applicant.
There is no public witness of the incident. It is further submitted that the
applicant does not have any criminal history. The applicant is in Jail since 1-

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the
accused ,severity of punishment and submissions of the learned counsel for
the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail

Let the applicant Sarfaraj involved in Case crime no. 515 of 2009 under
sections 25/4 Arms Act, Police Station Gangoh district Saharanpur be
released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the
like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following

` (i)The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

(ii)The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

(iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.

(iv) The applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first
week of each month to show his good conduct and behaviour.
In case of breach of any of the above mentioned conditions the court below
shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

Order Date :- 8.1.2010

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information