IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BAN DATED THIS THE 09'?" DAY OF OCTOBER BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM O1:a£'n:3.Y O O'
MISC.WR1T N0. 9945 among _
WRIT PETITION No.1-9980 0F.20Q9-ES”-‘D’IS) ‘
SARGENT PRASAD C.M. ._ V
S/0 DEVSHARAN. PRASAI) _ ‘
AGE 52 _.
_614’84’o.-R}
R/A HoUsE;’NQ..2;’- FLOOR “_ ” ‘
JAYANA coMP1_.J«:x; “BHARATHIDJAGAR
HUNUSU1\iE_ARAN’AHALL-I4 ‘P05’:
BANGALO._RE_ V
. PETITIONER
, Q_ (By E3:iV;C’AswATTLAmRAYANA REDDY, ADV )
I THECOUZMCON OF INDIA
‘ M’ENIS’TRY OF DEFENCE
SANSAD MARG
A ” NEW DELHI 110011
‘.2 AIR FORCE COMMANDING
AIR FORCE RECORD OFFICE
SUBROTO PARK, NEW DELHI 1 1001 1
3 THE AIR FORCE COMMANDING
AIR FORCE STATION, JN
YELAHANKA
BANGALORE 63
4 GROUND CREW EXAMINATION BOARD ”
No.3, BRD AIR FORCE r ” “-
CHANDIGARH
REP BY ITS OFFICER COMMANEING ‘
(By Sri : HJAYAKARA sHETrY,:A:)v ” A V
THIS MISC.W FILED UNDER SE-CTIO’N”15’1V4 of’ CPC
PRAYING TO PASS ; Q~RDE3R._ HEAR THE
W.P.9946/2009.
THIS €:3’wOV’1;\A/§EI’§[:*s?L”3r:VA(3A1?§’~.EAOARVVVORDERS, THIS
DAY THE CQUR;”A’E\/hX,DE ‘mE_ EQLLQWING :
Heard; are made out. The application
is rejected *
Sd/w
JUDGE