TR! 3313″! TI I\l”II’\I’f’IIf’I\l’I
IIITII %\I\ll\I \II’ I\l\I\I’l’|I
f’II’\lH FIIIJFI I-MI’-Jikl \lI’ I\«P1l\IVl’|IP|l\fI 5’II\5l’l QNIEJBS ‘IT I\l\fl3’f’|Il’|l\l\ I’lI\’I1 \-¢\I’NJI\I ‘ll’ I\l1l\l’l”|I.l’\I\-I’| TIIIJI1 \n\Il
vi} 1933 9: inccme — R2. 1§,GQfif«
?atsl » aa.2,g5?s§1;~
13, ficcmrdingly, the appeal :3 a1L@?§§ :£m
73;.
part awarding a sum cf Rs.2,8$,55i£~ a agaifi2t2; ‘.
gum cf Rs.2,1i,911K~ awarfied by the Tzifiufiaigfffia
enhanced amount sf Rs.?3;54§j¥ éhéii _”fié:fy.
interaat at the rate cf $§>p.a;”§rcm §h§ flack af”
petition till the date 6: r§ali3§ti§§;»_ _}
14. The first #%é§§éfi§§ntgifi§#:ance fiompany
ahall depgg;t R§n§§¥am§fifitv %i:ni§:’$ix weeks frsm
the aata cf racaifié af”§ fibpg §f_g§a judgment ané
an such fiapaait, fit; éaamnfi afiaii ha raiaaaed in
favour af thé:a§géiiQhfi*ifimfifi;éta:y;
Qffi¢§– is flipécted :a”£fi2w’ mg tha gwarfi
a¢%ar£ing;y;aa
Sd/–
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
;g3u_f