Central Information Commission Judgements

Sh. Sarita Kandari vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 31 December, 2008

Central Information Commission
Sh. Sarita Kandari vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 31 December, 2008
                     CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                              Room No.415, 4th Floor, Block IV,
                             Old JNU Campus, New Delhi 110066.
                                   Tel: + 91 11 26161796

                                                   Decision No. CIC /WB/A/2008/00806/SG/0791
                                                             Appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2008/00806/

Relevant Facts

emerging from the Appeal

Appellant : Sh. Sarita Kandari,
D-132, New Seemapuri,
Delhi-110095.

Respondent 1 : Director (Primary Education) & PIO,
Municipal Corporation of Delhi,
Kashmiri Gate,
Delhi-110006.


RTI application filed on                :        21/08/2007
PIO replied                             :        02/11/2007
First appeal filed on                   :        29/01/2008
First Appellate Authority order         :        Not Mentioned.
Second Appeal filed on                  :        13/05/2008

Information Sought:

The Appellant had filed an application seeking information for the year 2006-07 regarding the MCD
Primary School (Second Shift), Block F-1, Sunder Nagari, Delhi.
Total 8 queries are there as follows:

1. Names of the Principal.

2. Timings.

3. In & Out time of each teacher.

4. Total number of the teachers in School.

5. Name of the every teacher.

6. What are the timings decide

7. Who is responsible to look after in absence of the teacher?

8. Requirement of the teachers?

9. Total number of working in the School?

10. Has the Principal informed to the officers about the shortage of teachers?

11. If yes, please provide the copy of the information letter.

The PIO’s Reply:

The PIO had replied partially information to the Appellant.

The First Appellate Authority Ordered:
Not Mentioned.

Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present
Appellant: Absent
Respondent: Mr.T.C.Arora PIO
The respondent has brought a letter from the appellant stating that the information has been
provided, and he does not wish to pursue the matter.

Decision:

The appeal is disposed.

This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
31 December 2008

(Any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)