High Court Kerala High Court

Sheena K.K vs The State Of Kerala on 24 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Sheena K.K vs The State Of Kerala on 24 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 33651 of 2009(B)


1. SHEENA K.K.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,

3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER,

4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.E.NARAYANAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :24/11/2009

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                    ================
                 W.P.(C) NO. 33651 OF 2009 (B)
                 =====================

         Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009

                         J U D G M E N T

The petitioner joined the office of the Superintending

Engineer, Irrigation, North Circle, Kozhikdoe as LD Clerk.

Subsequently, in 2002, she was deployed for two years to a

Grama Panchayat. Although, on completion of the term of

deployment, she was ordered to be repatriated to her parent

department, despite Ext.P5 order issued by the Government on

5/9/2008 directing repatriation of employees like the petitioner,

making appointment to the post to be vacated by them, it is

complained that the 3rd respondent has not taken any action on

Ext.P5.

2. It is seen that complaining of the above, petitioner has

also moved the 3rd respondent by filing Exts.P6 and P7. If as

stated, by Ext.P5, Government have issued directions concerning

the case of the employees like the petitioner, there is no reason

why the 3rd respondent shall not take appropriate consequential

action in the matter.

3. In any case, having regard to the pendency of Exts.P6

WPC 33651/09
:2 :

and P7 before the 3rd respondent, I direct the 3rd respondent to

take appropriate action on the representations made by the

petitioner duly adverting to Ext.P5 and as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this

judgment along with a copy of this writ petition.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp