High Court Karnataka High Court

Shiek Nizamuddin vs Sharadamma on 20 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Shiek Nizamuddin vs Sharadamma on 20 October, 2009
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
Lu'

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 20?" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIgI:RI- A. V.

WRIT PETITION N0.18OO3 OF' 2009 (GE\/IwC«3:3¥_'C_1, i-,1 2  --  "

BETWEEN   

SHIEK NIZAMUDDIN
AGE 40 YEARS  _  

S/O ANWAR PASHA, OCC: BUSINESSMAN 

R/A 5TH CROSS, BAPUJI NAGAR    ~ - -' 
SHIMOGA     "~...._PI:,T1TIONER

[BY SR1 v1CHNESHWAi'<A.A  %SI§IA.STRvI,A:'AOVOCATE)
AND   .  .. .

1. SHARAIJAIxIA1xxIg; _
Age: SSYEARS     -- [
W/O ITIIGAPPA, 'OfC.Ci*EjIGUSEHOLD
R/A TANI;_MOHAI_,LA,'- _  .._ '"
SHIMOCA TOWN, SHIMOGA DISTRICT

2.1-. C SHAIIUN*'IAIA, M"AJ__QR'
 'D/O SALWAPPA
 IR/O.T;m_\IRI IIIOIIALLA,
' ~..SH_IMOr;AiOVJ131~~, SHIMOGA DISTRICT

PUTTI, MAJOR
V Age: '30 
»-  *-D/O S1-\,1V_\FNAPPA
R/VOTTANK MOHALLA,
* .SHI1\&.OGA TOWN, SHIMOGA DIST

 1'_~_/iANJAPPA,MAJOR
 "S/O DURGIGUDI
I EXTENSIONH,SHI1\/IOGACITY  RESPONDENTS

{BY SR1 S V PRAKASH FOR R1}

Ix)

THIS WRIT PETITION iS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DT. 30.5.2009 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1I IN EXECUTION
PETITION NO. 105/I997 ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE,
[JR.DVN), SHIMOGA AS PER ANNEX–G AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITiON COMING ON FOR ORDERS

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER];

This petition is rejected reserxvéring’-_the

petitioners side to file a duly coiisVtituted”‘a_ppe.”aI alzorig with’

the necessary application oi Ideiay in filing
the appeal and for the etc. The
Appellate Court application for
condonatiohHoI fact that the petitioner
has been pirosectitiiitf remedy by filing this writ
petitionglpd I A I I

«to safeguard the interest of both the parties

between the date of disposal of this

petition I.arid”I:th’e”Idate of disposal of the anticipated LA in the

.1 appeal. this Court also deems it necessary to

the parties to maintain status~«quo for a period of

days or ’tile disposal of the LA for stay, Whichever is

earlier.

£33.

3. Now that the main matter itself is disposed of,

nothing survives for any consideration of Misc.W.832:’7/QOOQ.

Accordingly it is dismissed as having become uniiecessarjf. — V”

§fia@§

Bvr