Shivaramaiah T vs The Divisional Manager on 21 January, 2010

I

IN TH E HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN GALORE

THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE L. I\%ARAYA.NA  

I')ate(i: This {he 21*' day ofJaI'"II.IaIy 2010

B E I' O R I3

M.F.A. NO.6016 /2ot5s3I'(I\./Ix/J3   

BETWEEN:

SHIVARAMAIAH '1'
S/O C THIMMAIAH  .
AGED ABOUT 34: f1f£;AR.s"' -- 1;' 
R/AT NO 36 4T¥"i----._C:ROS_S  2T1' €.__I'-I/IAIN
RAGHAVENDRA   
SRINAGAR   1 .
BANGALQRI3--50;_' '  ' 

5    'j.'~AvPI'E5?LLAN'I'

{By Sr:--- IéAI5'1 1;;  :3fI5IuGI:m«:I\I'I' ANI) AWARD DA"I'EI') 1§.I2.2007 PASSED
V _  'gI_I\:'~ ~IvI'vc 310.6383/2006 ON 'I'I--{E FILE OF XIX
 _£iD£)i'FlONAL SCJ & MAUI', I3ANGA.LORi'<3. SCCILI7.
V' PAR'I'LY ALLOWING
COMPENSATION AND SEEZKING EINI--I.A.NCI£M}£N'I'

TH E C LAIM PEITITION

COMIHENSATION.

I'

4

FOR
OF



Ti"*ilS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS 'l'_.IflIS
DAY. 'l"}"lE£ COURT l)I¥3l,iVf3REl) "I"l'"{E3 FOLLOWING:  

JUDGlVIEIN'I'

Though this matter is po§ji.ed fol'"'a'ell:21iesi('3:V1. 

with consent: of the learned c:cj'i4.11'1sgelA. i'or'»1:h'e_lpaftiesfi'

the ma1:te1* is; heard finally    

2. Agg3"ieved;__ by  ailrarded
by the tribunal, .4 p_1feferred this
appeal for 

 ' O Theeoiii;efiti_oh of the learned Counsel for

the appelIgin.t is  the Cl'c1lfI18.i1l. was geuing

 R$'.'i<.O,QGQM/-- sé{1ary.i«per month. To SE.1bSl,2lHl,l'c1l.€ the

 ' §1p_pel1a11f: has produced the pan card

  the tribunal has taken the momliiy

 salary ae'. Rs.3.000/-- which is on the lower side. He

 he1é3"';'1ls<) subm3'iited tihai: in respem. of loss of amenities

cf life. nothing has been aw211"ded. The il'1jE.1jl't',(l was an

inpatient. in the h<)spii,21l for more than 3} days and

he has taken rest for n'1o1*e t'1"1:;:n six rnomhs.

"X.



*\
_'!

4. The tribunal has aw21i'(i(1r(i Coi'hpensatioi1 of

 15.000/~ towards food, C()i1\~'eyai'1(:e. 1'1(:)L1i'ish.m"0.11t'.

incidental expenses etc. which is very 1<)wf.._

stated by the Doctor PW--2 that the 21pp'c'J::l21vht=.  '

suffered fracture and other tihjziriies-:' -fc_1.VI"i~d.J"hV€ 

underwent op<:~rat,1oh twice andflhé-.~._ xvas»,é;C1hVis"ed'=-4 to V

take rest. for six  it  the
comperisation of  T.(')'\xv\Vf';cA1I'V(ALVVivS food.
Conveyanocz,  ;.,t1:1:dAA.',:'._1'j§K'(_)'_urishment is
very tow  is the
subrf':.Vissiohh'rfia€1o"by'th's.._oou'nsei for the appeliariti.

    for the respondent

51/1h§1’1ii£:s that theiabsence of any proof of income.

.A ‘isho i_f.tZ1″iAbLi_r1ai has taken the monthly saiary at

the rxlainiant has produced the

par: c:’é1rd’.” he has not produced any document. in

it ‘p*1’o_()f of his salary. ‘I’hereior€. cornpensation

‘jawélrded by the triburial towards pain and stafihwing is

it “just and proper. “Q

l
1

The award is a<:co1"d1'ng.1y modified by a]_.ie\_}v-iylg

the appeal in part". 'I'he responds-int.

deposit the enharlcerd <:()n1pe_nss21.t.1o:1_" u}'it}?1'.i_n "f(4)'uV1'

weeks from today.

Dvr: