High Court Kerala High Court

Sibi Sukumaran vs The District Collector on 15 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sibi Sukumaran vs The District Collector on 15 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34338 of 2010(N)


1. SIBI SUKUMARAN,S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 35 ,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. CORPORAITON OF KOLLAM REP.BY

3. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,

4. GIREESHAN R

                For Petitioner  :SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :15/11/2010

 O R D E R
                        P.N. RAVINDRAN, J.
                     -------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.34338 of 2010
                     -------------------------------
         Dated this the 15th day of November, 2010

                           J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a resident of Kollam Corporation.

Aggrieved by the poultry farm being run by the fourth respondent, he

along with others have filed Ext.P1 representation before the Kollam

Corporation and Ext.P2 representation before the Kerala State

Pollution Control Board. The grievance voiced by the petitioner in this

writ petition is that fourth respondent is conducting the poultry farm

without a licence issued by the Corporation of Kollam and without the

necessary consent to operate from the Kerala State Pollution Control

Board. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to

respondents 2 and 3 to enquire into Exts.P1 and P2 representations

and take an appropriate decision thereon, within a time limit to be

fixed by this Court.

2. Sri.M.K.Chandra Mohandas, the learned standing

counsel appearing for the Kollam Corporation and the Kerala State

Pollution Control Board submitted that respondents 2 and 3 will

enquire into the grievance voiced by the petitioner in Exts. P1 and P2

representations, with notice to the petitioner and the fourth

respondent and take an appropriate decision expeditiously.

In the light of the said submission, I dispose of the writ

W.P.(C) No.34338 of 2010

2

petition with a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to enquire into

Exts.P1 and P2 complaints respectively and take an appropriate

decision thereon after notice to the petitioner and the fourth

respondent expeditiously and at any rate, within two weeks from the

date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this

judgment before respondents 2 and 3.

P.N. RAVINDRAN,
JUDGE.

nj.