I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 267" DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009 BEFORE THE HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE AJIT J.GUNg._IAL:' ~ , WRIT PETITION N'0.34609 or 2oo9(sMlA/Q A I BE}! WEEN: Smt.Kiran D Shetty, _ D/0.1ate Raghuram Shetty, I Aged 35 years, R/a Kailkere, Molahallj Vi11age--,-- Kundapura Taluk. _ , ~ Udupi District. " " " " jf sA.,,I.';r>,ET1T1oNER [Sri Pundikai 1,s;iW;,;ra fE3III§it_;*V:,:A<i:V;:},O' ? AND: 1. Sri S /0 _Sayy"sd_ Beary, M;i§,vir:a.katt€," Kuazdgtpura Taluk, A U.d'up'iV.D'isjtriCt. """ " 3,2," II:\Te9.;.ti'oai13:.1I"jtnsurance C0. Ltct, - AI\/I--u11iV(:'i;'a[;:-J Road. i£t1n(I£:1p_11'j1.*.2A1 Branch, Kunctapura ~ 576 201. _ Rep.-by its Manager. ...RESPONDE-NTS " his writ petition is fiied under Articles 226 and 227 oflthe Constitution of India praying to quash the order I' ..dated 26.10.2009 passed by the District Judge & MACT. Ix) Kundapura, on I.A.No.l2 in MVC No./470/2002 vide Annexure-A. ._ This writ petition coming on for preliininarfi this day, the Court made the following: " " '~ The petitioner is a elaimant.:=, :an accident. A claim petition is*lod_gedV." '-Dxuringpitiipepepndencyli* of the proceedings, an ap_p1'i-ciation lpfvnilecii by the respondent to summorna said application
was granted. A :3econd”‘apf§licati’on is moved for an
identical I’€_l4.1’_.rg.§–f.4 l;’)1(3f_,i.'[1()__I1€’§’1′.” objection. But
however, the” ‘ix/litvhdrawn. Another
application «filed :.»of the third respondent
against whom th=e_cla.im petition is dismissed for identical
relief for-summoningllthenritness. Learned member of the
Triliiinall application but however makes an
ivT”-V’obse’rvat.ion order passed on I.A~lO should be
«. ../’,T§:~’§p1′<,_f_.(;,'VI1 effect' to} /fl
/Z'
2. Mr.Pundikai Ishwara Bhat, learned counsel
appearing for t.he petitioner submits that the
application is rejected, the Tribunal
directed summons to the witness.
3. Apparently, it is to be n0ti’eed.A_A_thatthe ‘a.pp1i<3atibn_V
I.A–12 is rejected but howedverrwith the that
the order passed on I./.t'x.~_.i.() g1ven"effee§t to. I do
not see how these the petitioner's
interest. Having I am of the
Vi€W that it
Petitioh. stands Iaearned Member of the
Tribunal XshaliL\"C0_hQ11i'de'*.the proceedings within three
Lf1br1ths"ifrbn1-ethexdated Aofrevceipt of a copy of this order.
Sd/-~ _;
JUDGE ‘