High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt N Umadevi W/O Chandrashekar vs The Bangalore Development … on 12 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt N Umadevi W/O Chandrashekar vs The Bangalore Development … on 12 August, 2008
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
_  7 'l"Es..Wrii' mum in filed mm An.226r'E7 afflie «Jim
'-._~,_131>_5_ (;smmm cf Sims) Rules, rm wam the msponcum and on
»r@stztic,an,s.!:sbeamttedmitewitiaouatiaaitialdepoai1,cac.

IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGAx,QRE   I:  .;.V   _

1'}'H:'HON"ELE MR JUSTICE £afHIfUVA}3i G  "  '; 
Writ mm" 5706 1     

SmtNUmad¢wi, 42yrs
W/oczxmdswekx  _ V' V 
Rfa#32,BSKIIStagc  1    *
malare 56e«m__ _  = _ -   .
Nowk/'a#45,   *  
An}mapuIa' l£:LmhzR;aad._i;   _ 

 . av' ' V _ ~.   "  .... ..

 nmwnixpefieim mmmgmrmonmsmawmecmzmae the

 



ORDER

Peum ‘ er ha sougt for a direction to 1i:e~r.=:.1pnndx H u

of site, and to calculate the compensation payafile

cmd1t’tothesamebyadmstmg’ ‘ a.eaamam:J§¢smdsdsea1k.amaa’: »
sfietobeallotted andmceivethe

Petauon’ ‘ er pumchmed _a site Be_Mmg.’.. j V v_ {m».114 :9′
30 x 40 ft. of the same was

dam’ g 1999. 931;: seesaag for auonmt of

theparties.

” _ A

asposmg of WP 293792001 and am matieta by

da£at£.._20.3;20lfi’, ‘ha impmed certain conditions in pa: 9, for such
_ x was acqumed’ winch’ was purchased prior’ to ‘ ‘”
‘ sitesaflcrvcufi cam’ .

Itisfi1esuhrnissimoffl1ecounMireprmcmingthcBDAthatthemis

~~xadelayofcig:tyca-sinseekingzsslief.

AV