Smt. Pushpawati Sangya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 November, 2010

                           W.A. No.1291/2010

23.11.2010


       Shri Dinesh Upadhyay, learned counsel for the appellant.

       Shri   Jaideep   Singh,   learned   Dy.   Govt.   Advocate   for   the 
respondents.

Heard on the question of admission.

This intra­court appeal has been preferred against the order 
dated   11­10­2010   passed   by   the   learned   Single   Judge   in   W.P. 
No.14418/2010.

The facts giving rise to filing of the instant appeal, briefly 
stated, are that the appellant is working on the post of Assistant 
Teacher in the Govt. Boys’ Primary School,  Kundeshwar, Sankul 
Kendra,   Kundeshwar,   District­Tikamgarh.     However,   he   was 
transferred from the aforesaid School to Pahadi, Tilwaran in the 
same District of Tikamgarh.  The aggrieved appellant filed the W.P. 
No.14418/2010 which  has been dismissed by the  learned Single 
Judge vide order dated 11­10­2010 which is under challenge in the 
present intra­court appeal.

Learned counsel for the appellant placing reliance on the 
policy­decision,   contained   in   Annexure­P/11,   vehemently 
contended   that   the   respondents   have   wrongly   transferred   the 
appellant declaring him a surplus employee.  However, during the 
course of argument  it is admitted by the learned counsel for the 
appellant that he holds a transferable post.    Learned counsel for 
the appellant submitted that under the aforesaid policy­decision 
though the appellant has preferred a representation/appeal before 
the Collector, Tikamgarh on 29­9­2010,   yet till date no decision 
has been taken on the representation/appeal of the appellant.

Learned   Dy.   Govt.   Advocate   fairly   submitted   that   the 
representation/appeal   of   the   appellant   shall   be   considered   and 
disposed of expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two weeks 
from the date of production of certified copy of the order passed 
today.

In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned Dy. 
Govt.   Advocate,   we   deem   it   appropriate   to   dispose   of   this   writ 
appeal   at   this   stage   with   the   direction   that   the 
representation/appeal of the appellant will be promptly decided 
by the Collector, Tikamgarh within a period of two weeks from the 
date of production of certified copy of this order without being 
prejudiced or influenced either by the observation made in this 
order or in the order passed in the writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ appeal stands finally disposed of.

C.c. as per rules.

                            (S.R.Alam)                                        (Alok Aradhe)
                          Chief Justice                                                Judge 
ac.