Smt R Kamala vs Sri Munishami on 27 May, 2009

3 WP. 13288108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BAN(}P{i.§OR3?i;§";--.j: LE7  

ii)ATE{) THIS THE 27TH DAY OF >MAY'.'200:§'_~v   O
BEFORE " ' ""'  
'1-'HE HONTBLE MRJUSTICEV'H..N.N}§G!§MOI~E;§N._:§£;$ :1 A

WRIT PETFFION N0:1028§3;]'2Q08 (OM-CFO) 

.BE'I'WEEN:--

1 Sm' R KAMALA 

w/ O. %VsR1'sa;BI3;A_ REOOY " 

AGEEI ABOUT. 42a.YEARs %
R/AT1YAi'..A'\fAH.§yLLI.VI£,LAGE
KAsABA_HOBL1_, 'MULBA"G=AL TALUK
KOLAR DESTRIGI'.  ' 

 Sm? DO §}fii'IJ'A,.. %%%%% .. O
  W/"O. ;3§€.I t;'}O_N RAJENDRA
 A AG§:OABO1j*r 40 YEARS
 R}_AT"SRIRA1f€GAPURA VILLAGE
IIST12Icr.-- %%%%% ~ *
"  %  I   RESPONIDENTS

 (B? SR:AA'%c;9%PA'P;SSi3i)Y, ADV.,)

..   FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

{rHS.,cSNSTmJT10N 013' INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH 'THE

 "~._C)RD}i_'i?_»D'E"'.1I.7.08, VIBE ANN-«A, PASSED ON I.A.NO.6 IN

"~."A..()S,ANCr;.V158/06, PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND
"Ji-I1I)IC_AIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MULBAGAL.

     This petition coming on for preiiminaxy hearing this
 _1f  

injunction. On the other hand,  

senior counsei for the  on of
this Court in IL}? 2007 '  cofiieriels that
before completion of Vevide1i§;eV,:'_it   the Court
to appoint a   the judgments.
A common: oiiiiboth the judwents is
that there    the Court to appoint a
ogurt Coiiimissioigeiiiiii  euit for bear injunction. The

éppoiiitmentiof Commissioner wili arise only if it is

  fouiid.  viiiere  ambiguity in the evidence adduced

 tiyvthe  the purpose of claxification of such an

  o

'  "';§kciii:1itte{113,r in the instant case, the evidence is not yet

'V V  A»eoI1iiieenced. After completion of evidence on both the side,

  it is always open for the respondent/ plaintiffs to file

f\_,,

5 WP. }0288f08

identzicai application seeking appointment of a Court

Commissioner. If such an application is flied, ~ _

Court shall consider the same in accordance WV
For the reasons stated above, ‘–_
oaDEa_ 4 2 i ‘

1) The wiit petition is k Q %
H) The impug1ed:_._”‘:«ordieii_ 1 1.07.2008 in
O.S.No. 153 Judge and

quashed. Limrty is

to file simflar

‘ ‘ “completion of evidence and the
considered by the trial Court in

‘ V with law.

§via*nfi’1g regpd to the nature of contmversy
Z the parties, a direction is hereby issued

to the trial Court: to expedite the matter and to

dispose the suit within a time frame of six

0″”

6 W.P.10288.’f38

months from the date of receipt of

order.

dh*