High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt V Dhanalakshmi vs H Mohan on 14 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Smt V Dhanalakshmi vs H Mohan on 14 September, 2010
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
1
I33 Tifi Pfififl CQLIRT C}? K!&R§fi'E'A% 8;? BfixI'¥GALC3RE
Q29's'I'E-B 'fiflfi TI-E 14"?" EA?!' GE?' SEF'I"Efs:%ER 231;}

BEFG§E

THE rmzmw gm, J£JS*'i'£(:E 5uE%.VEX{IGQ?fiEfi"-«§fi'J2*}A_Vg  1'  - ' 

'§?1P..3*¥:3.1@"§'i[gG3.Q §€;%§iI--' %

   

 

Smt. 'Si. § mm
Agad about 53 ywwra,

wfa. 5.. Kg Rafizy . ' 
Rim: Ha,41gg;,   _ 
3 Stagag Charflra Layaug 
figayazmgarg  V   "  1 2 "

Ra errtedbr'--Az§;. Ra'1z?_ ,   .

I-ialéaf)    

Aged abo1;;_V53~~;§%e$.;€3. V   *    PEETTTORER

{By 82%;  G.  '

 a

' 8,1' 9,. 'B5. fiaizmirzazztimpm,

R'f.2.1;._}.'§a;5.; '=@H"C»i"::;s:z~=..a:§

1 hé1∈'--.§-?ca;.Ci§.;j . 

 ' 'V Han§a§asa;:;;>&'j'EXtm1si§n,

z¢aggr%s 2aaa~: Rwd,

  % g_B"az;g5a.3ss:£'i°1 

2a.m.2me4§ The written _am:e§u1e£:~:,  was _';;?§E:3e& 

2:2.m.2eQ5 am the case sf '*::iafe%'1€i.:::_§:':1:A 
 r Despite film  filfid on
23.92.2093

ia barwfi 54 61′
the schfiule $63. Lmzmeé
came; Order 6 Rule: 17:

off $36.5 He further
auzmm itfhe pminzsfi’ has mt Shawn

due ‘V afigfidmant if aflawati WGLIM

its the éafiendant atxi Imnce,

in arrfim at fhfi G$fi§iu$-1333 that

” ifwere ta he aficzwatig the nature eftha

cthangl and th& mass 9%’ afitififl else: chagw, in

afséeznzcsx am apggtmnm 2% am mm; 1-ejacma.

_/’

-M:

5;, Ehaves garuyseazi £333 writ. wtiten papam.
5, Tim paint far aoxmifierafian is, Whestixer V?:?:1_¢

impzzfld csrfler is §rr*a&em3 am iikgai.

?” The plainfifi $13 sasking substim§§¢’i*§.::: af *

_-‘ ‘ ;'”.

§-am para 8 9f tfém

the grayezr. in mtg 8 affim it

mbgarfimfiy stated that, ‘
mnszsw :3; that than éafarifiant gar:

3? tin aonwast fix tfi qf t, the suit

” is aw far mney ts) tha

ciman mung}? wiflu ‘ 1:,

c.sa:mt;§a:~Le;-ggfk éfif the earztract, that

%%%m s;bm;:&s yam Vfiam me am af’ the t.

mfimd that {ha :£afer1fian?, ‘m

hifi wt”: (if the mnflaat 81$. hav1n.g’

‘ W H 3,3,? aka fer smffin mfiarmm, baa cfiasarz

‘z.$:é§¢’–Aan3y ‘ af mm@. The applm’ ti.-zazi havrfi

/’:

been mm at: 23.0′?,;”£;’fiG& is heyszzé 3 ysam gmé {mm

the date tiw 3123:: was iiwtitlimii 552,5 an 1%’ 113?.2m«=}.: T’i’*1:;:e

shim mam in the applieaéiieri £3 g;s:«-facie 335%

hm i%:a§Lnz3;, ‘fine eavziazziae mm fiarfi mené

lw aibwad, sinw tkm seem w@uifi}ea;;AAa »3j;.i:i§;:é_;t isc:5’ tc.:..£ f

ts Even at}1%7zse,rc:§3:z1si;:d5V;Aae: *ii:2;;n; 5?

suit mzimwa, me prapcfinfici
‘E3 decide the m} qnmfifiga t1:¥e 1;>ax”tiea§
sirme this csnwawffiy SE rafauxé sf
moms mid aw-t%=nsnt&&reé2%»11»2€w ma
mt am In am saki vim at’
the %gugn’§aa in hsfiirg am; if

the pmntéfif ta amma the sum it

v;*euld+_;f§§xa.ng@Vtha.V_fc$ a usgc§ 9f aeiien azmfi aim the natura 9f

rm fine d.:i711genm 335:; on the mrt af

the/c pmviae unfisr: Rule 1? Gréar

H V asf Fmceéurse st:-aanrwa in the way 5? {Em

fer mm aihwcfi. \Q\

far’

In this malt; egvrit pgtitian is éasmifl cf mmit azfi

aimil wand dismissal.

§ the min} mart shafi éacélée

22.32% lififififié by ‘ihfi fiffifir impuwfid passed

the fifififivfifififl mafia herein V

mmiéaratian cf tha greunds

tzxfimr sziuaijagge, It is mafia ¢i:=:a”:.”*. tkmtg Em

cxgrwmfi rm tha mwit cfiizkfge :1:éi:é”ia:;iit,

Ififie