High Court Kerala High Court

Sreekantan vs State Of Kerala Representd By The on 5 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sreekantan vs State Of Kerala Representd By The on 5 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 1066 of 2010()


1. SREEKANTAN,CHERUVATTUVILA,KUNNAPUZHA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTD BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.  K.SHAJ

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :05/03/2010

 O R D E R
                        K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                    ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 1066 of 2010
                  ------------------------------
              Dated this the 5th day of March, 2010

                             O R D E R

The first accused in Crime No.278/2009 of Poojappura

Police Station has filed this application for anticipatory bail

under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are

under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324 and 308 read with

Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that after completing the

investigation, charge sheet was laid in the case and the case is

pending as C.P. No.85/2009 on the file of the court of the

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram. It is

also submitted that a non bailable warrant was issued by the

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate against the petitioner. The

petitioner apprehends arrest in execution of the warrant. The

Bail Application is filed in these circumstances.

4. In Vineeth Somarajan @ Ambadi Vs. State of

Kerala [2009(3) KHC 471], it was held that in cases where

non-bailable warrant is issued by a court, the proper remedy

B.A. No. 1066/2010
2

of the accused is to approach that court which issued the warrant

and to apply for recalling that warrant and for the grant of bail.

It was also observed in Vineeth Somarajan’s case that when such

an application for bail is filed, the same has to be considered in

the light of the principles laid down in Biju Vs. State of Kerala

[2007(2) K.L.T 280]. In Sukumari Vs. State of Kerala

[2001(1) K.L.T.22], it was held that the power under

Section 437 can be invoked by the Magistrate even in cases

involving a Session offence.

Reserving the right of the petitioner to move the court

which issued the non bailable warrant, for recalling the warrant

and for the grant of bail, this Bail Application is closed.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm