Sreekumar @ Chillu @ Muneer @ Babu vs State Of Kerala on 15 July, 2006

0
50
Kerala High Court
Sreekumar @ Chillu @ Muneer @ Babu vs State Of Kerala on 15 July, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4417 of 2008()


1. SREEKUMAR @ CHILLU @ MUNEER @ BABU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs


1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJIT

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :15/07/2006

 O R D E R
                                   K. HEMA, J.

                     -----------------------------------------------
                       Bail Appl.No. 4417 of 2008
                     -----------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 11th day of July, 2008.

                                       ORDER

Petition for bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 332 and 307

of IPC. According to prosecution, the petitioner was absconding in a

case registered against him and when the Police Constable went to

arrest him in connection with the case, the petitioner stabbed him

with a dagger and escaped from arrest. The de facto complainant

sustained grievous injury.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

petitioner is in custody from 24.3.2008. He is on bail in other cases.

He is acquitted in certain other cases. Therefore, petitioner may be

granted bail and he is prepared to abide by any conditions.

4. This petition is opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor

submitted that petitioner is involved in 14 other cases. Even the arrest

of the petitioner became difficult because of the criminal activities of

petitioner. He does not co-operate with the trial and absconded. The

attempt made by the police officials to arrest him resulted in an

offence of the nature in the present case. Therefore, it is submitted

that no amount of condition will save the situation, if he again

absconds.

I am satisfied of the submissions made by the learned Public

Prosecutor. On the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find it

fit to grant bail to the petitioner. Petitioner may seek is remedy before

appropriate court for expeditious disposal of the case.

Petition is dismissed.

K. HEMA, JUDGE.

Krs.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here