High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Amaresha vs Sri M B Veerendra Singh on 14 August, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Amaresha vs Sri M B Veerendra Singh on 14 August, 2009
Author: Lok Adalath
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT . A "

1N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG,A_LC)'R,'E.:"'~.,,

DATED THIS THE 14"' DAY OF AUGUS1*«':?099G"'  A'

CONCILIATORS RR::SENT:,  q A

HON'BLE MRJUSTICE B,,sREE'mvAsE%GOwbA:,G'R-ALVA

SRI. A.K.BHAT,'*M"ElVIBER.    
Misc. First A3 A9" 
(Lok Adaiat ,_Aio.. .9118/Z'0.(}9)"» _

SRLAMARESHA, , , ,    
S/O.LINGAPPA,3;3 Y!'-_EARS,?'_,__     A

R/AT. ALAHALLI,    

THERANA HA|;LI"PQS'f!", '*:;, 'T

VOKKALUR H*OBLI_,      1 ;

KOLAR DISTRICT.' A _    _ ..A£'PELLANT

V"(e3_,A\?' vSfi1.,|{;_1'".  RUDEVA PRASAD,
A » _ SRI. Hu.R."sATHvAr>AL, ADVOCATES)


v 'in 

1. '---SRI-. M.v..B'.~..VEETRENDRA SINGH,
S/O';-MA; ETALA31 SING}-l, MAJOR,
NO;1-7,62/E, 47*" CROSS,

3 ADARSHNAGAR, ARALERI MAIN ROAD,

 ""!V}ALUR,-,K"OLAR DISTRICT.

  A-UN.I'l%ED INDIA INSURANCE CO. _LTD.,

A  DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NO.11,

    198, MANJUr\iATe'fi% COMPLEX,

2"" FLOOR CHM COMPLEX,
NEAR DOUBLE ROAD,



INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE. 
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER. ..RespondVents

(BY SRI. GANGADHAR SANGOLLI, ADVOCATE__FOi7{iRej2i}:_.:i4 %

THIS MFA FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT A<;A_I.NS.rif'TH'E«i.:3u.D@iMENT""--.._
AND AWARD DATED 01-10~200S PASSED IN M--'\fC»N.O.73_'0 /20D4'4ON.TI5IE'P'PILEA. E
OF THE VII ADDL. EUDGE, MEMBER, MACT43, CQUF<',T1OFASMALL.,_pCAVUSf":S,'~._

METROPOLITAN AREA, BANGALORE. (SCcH"+3),1__PARTLv ';»'\LL€)&VvTI'i'=3.G7i.THE
CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION 3!. SEEKING ENHANCEMENT 'OF
COMPENSATION. '   I    

THIS MFA COMING ON FOR OONOH-..1AT.1_oN s's.PORE i;e,oK ADALAT
AFTER BEING REFERRED  "J.I'DEi"--.. ORDER" DATED
29--07--20o9, THE FOLLOWING ORDER' [S i'?AS;SIED.*--.._'».,e  _

cO1~rc1LI.ajI':oI~I. ~ 
The learned Cc3I1n:sei__.fOI:'th::e iapp_e11aiIt'a;u'd the learned counsel

for respondent ----IrIusII~rarIpCeii along with the representative

are present.

2. AfterV_protriacted.Vitegotiations, the matter is settled. The
ap’pe1}anti:I..ha;3.Iagreed iitO””reCeiVe and the respondent — Insurance

pay a sum of Rs.88,000/– (Rupees Eighty

‘1i’hOI.Isandi with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of

petitiorvritill the date of deposit, in addition to the amount

the Tribunai, in full and final settlement of the Claim. A

is filed on behalf of the parties to this effect.

3

3. The respondent -~ Insurance Company has agreed to deposit

the said amount, within six weeks from the date of preparation of
Award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at–6″/o p.a.

from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall .b.e.VVt:e’lea_jsed.__V

in favour of the appellant.

5. This miscellaneous first appeal
of the Joint Memo. The award of thé”s4Tribunal” sha3Ji’;si;t§i§1″‘:flod1fied
accordingly. Draw up the _ A it

Sd/-~
Judge

30.

‘Wm

«.i.i.RR.._i d