High Court Kerala High Court

Sri.Anish Kumar.V. vs State Of Kerala on 17 June, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sri.Anish Kumar.V. vs State Of Kerala on 17 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 18697 of 2010(J)


1. SRI.ANISH KUMAR.V., AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

3. THE GENERAL MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :17/06/2010

 O R D E R
                     K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J
                       ...........................................
                    WP(C).NO. 18697                   OF 2010
                      ............................................
          DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010

                                 JUDGMENT

The petitioner is working as an Agricultural Officer under the

third respondent, District Co-operative Bank, with effect from

20.12.2002. The complaint of the petitioner is that the petitioner has

not been given the benefit of the successive pay revisions that were

implemented by the Government. According to the petitioner, his post

was initially included in the pay scale of Rs.6650 – Rs.13,900/-.

However, by an omission in the Government Order dated 23.4.1999,

his post was omitted to be included in the said scale. Thereafter, by

another G.O dated 1.3.2001, the omission was rectified. However, the

petitioner complains that as per Exts.P6 and P8 which are the

subsequent pay revision orders, the post of Agricultural Officer

occupied by the petitioner has been relegated to a lower category. The

petitioner claims that he is entitled to a higher pay scale than what is

presently granted to him.

2. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P9 representation setting out

Wpc 18697/2010 2

his grievances which is pending before the first respondent. The

petitioner complains that no orders have been passed thereon, till date.

He prays for the issue of appropriate directions for an early disposal of

Ext.P9.

3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of

directing the first respondent to consider the grievances of the

petitioner set out in Ext.P9, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as

possible and at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of

being heard to the petitioner also.

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE

lgk