High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri H C Nanjunde Gowda S/O. Late … vs The Mysore Minerals Limited on 12 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri H C Nanjunde Gowda S/O. Late … vs The Mysore Minerals Limited on 12 January, 2009
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
_ 2 _

2 CHIEF AQMINISTRATIVE ENE
VIGILANCE GFFICER
MYSORE MINERALS LIMITEB
REG QFFICE NO. 39
MAHATMA GANDHI RGAQ
BRNGRLORE " 560003.

3 THE MANRGER
BAGESHAPURA
KUILAN WQRKS

ARASIKERE HOBLI _   V    
HASSAN DIST - 573   'ETs'poN;DENTs

{By 33:2; CH}\I\fDR.?>'~\K}%N'§'H_«R GGULAT, T'-EXDV.  

THIS WRIT =}?ETI'ITI'C$N j-13- _E13:T§:':> a:;ir.3':3§:R. ARTICLE
:26 AND 2.2f:..<'<:::§'_--- THE T C<f)N'S'I'ITL¥TIQN OF INEEIA,
R.z--:::{I_:=1::; TO  T115'. "R; T.0jj--r:3¥:zgr:*f ;9§=:;vza.'>TI;~¢ TO
THE. ,19}33T3:f{':%i<:mf:;'2V'";23;1.,s<j---»iT'jTAHa_.,}Tv--".:1N_V*3:H:a:.._C;§r:'I:::E ORDER ET. 4.?.200:3
VIBE AN}:-:>,_ wERE'~.PRé:M<fH*..§1.: AND TO GRANT ALL THE
c0NsEQz_rEN=TIAL Ba1~;éEA:«'1T':"-tTT.

2
P

fmlg WRETVV ?§.1TI'.'E'ION CCMING GN FQR

;_'j 'P.REL'ZF1I£f$.3\J§?z'A HEAR--T--:q" 'B' GROUP THIS 323', THE
 COURT §'AS.SED«..VTHEZ FGLLCWING:

O R D E R

:”’1″

33″

VD

I héva heard the learned Counsel for

“$arEiesf

In this case, petitioner has filed a

a re@resentati®n as per Pmnexu£e«F to censider

E

~.

premetgsn. There 1% no reason as to why the

.. 3 ..

his Case for premetion on the ground that hiére
juniors have been promoted te the poet fir g§geL¥{‘
Resistant in the grade of Rs,5,?QQ.§W§r§§b?%fe
Since the 1,” respondent did
said representatien, the §e:;ti¢n§n egg filefi
this writ getition fie: e figméeeeeedireeting

the 1″t responfi wt “to yes; ideffi the said

Li)

. …. ‘… ….. ~.~ » –

representation_1nuacCerdée¢efwithrl’w.

5}”:

«.20

‘ Materiel en rederd fileafly establishes

that the petitioner nae filed a representation

5…».

D

Q

as ger’Annefiure:? defied 21.7.2908 reeuest

H)

O

¥”‘i

»ondentJ*teg eensider his ease

part. I direci the 1″ respondent to

the said representation ffiknnexure H

accordance with law within a .:[:%'<c3'»¢':?,iO<.?.'9_ ovf"'i't'i3r€~ve:'A.

months from the date of recé«ip:f,Ai"?3fii"cvépy1

this order. It is harebgk-_s§i;1..arifie_d'i;hat"ftE'1'i;é
order should not b@ ,.;1nde1;s–t<:}cd""~-as e§€:;v»r.€a=$%5ing

any opinion on merits4"of'-t'i:e:':'»§1a1i'tV§: in one way

5d,…

judge

Kmrl