High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri K S Bhaskar vs M/S Good Marning Pharmaceuticals on 20 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri K S Bhaskar vs M/S Good Marning Pharmaceuticals on 20 March, 2008
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
 ". Ean§aloref56O 053. ,,-ngg

ifi Tfifi Hr'" T O? xnfifiamzia ET Enfiaaiofii
DATED THIS THE 20" DAY OF MARCH 2003 _
BEFORE V
was nouvann nr.ausw1ca x.3anxrHafiama§;$"[ f'
CRIMINAL PETITION.Nov12s§}éQg§ .". ;
BETWEEN: ' ' ' 2 'x


S/0 Koragaiah Shetty,

Aged about 46 years,
Proprietor, , xx ; . 
Mfs.Canara Distributor3,sj3
R/at No.175/73, 55":core3p

St" main; 4'5,Blockrw- V. - a V "»
Rajajinagar,uBang§lQr§vlQ;# ,V"

...Pl!I!IONlR

(By Sri5K}A,§a$hé, Aav}*7' 

M/sgGood Mo:fiihg_Pharmaceuticals,

By its S.P.A§H¢lde;}«4x

Sri.Piyush sfo"Futermal Rajhia,

Major, Nm.30,fM.R.Lane,

Dgddanna Comglex,

1"' floor. Manavarthpet,

ND!!!

""fh;s} ér1.p. is filed under Sectiph 492 of
Ur.P§C.w praying to set aside the orfier dated

9{2.EGG8 passed by the 13"
68

CMM, Bangalore. in
02/06 issued the 'FaL.W. and -N R W to

1'V§J..'I!VI'

This Crl.P. is Gaming on for admiésion this

day, the Court made the foliowing;--

I
 

 



Vuvurnornu I1:-IIIIII-II:-Iniafi IL1|\.Ill §a\rI.ll\I 'yr: II:-1.11:':-|<I.l-|.|\rI ||l\.III 'person! s': II..r'u;\It:'-II.I-|I\r- Ill

'---"-y¢-.-_ ---- nu----u-'u------nu.'

flu potitionulaccusodlayllgnt _  " 3   ;_ A' 

1.

9.-.’….-..I-.a $6922.19? is 99.. -29 .!~_s 1.!-nu_t. -I-Me:
Ignl–I an II’) ‘O OH’ Hm, I H I-In Jpn nanny .
Iiivvulnul ‘Iva VII: VIII’ BE 0 to It 3|.-

C’.f:.lIa.6’ifiiifi§’ on tho – oir*._’_”‘Ai:J5*aoVfiii”

mu Calla”. ‘ ‘

__ _ _ _, _ _. …. __
:9 the -ee-ge%..t}:j..£.’e £234.-g-.e:~-e_ti with.

3.. disposal.

I. for the potitianor
submit; _tha£”‘-1;l_ie. patitioiior/«caused was convicted

“:9; ‘p’;:.g.~,..1.«a’Il\Ib1Il undo: auction 13! or
‘t:h’e.:. )’t.w:A.a§t ground that the cheque – iuund

In I sum or has lnlclu vu
‘ 4- V1’ho petitioner wan sentenced to pay
” .§ ‘.:£in9.A of nn.a,5z..oooI-. in «nun: at pqunt:
tha nccuud shall undo:-go 8.1. to: ‘ 01::

‘T . !§r;i:l:g gag! gut 13! ch; ting mount awarded,

” ‘” ‘aanannnntinn of 33 = 3 – 59 – gag I- t__ gygg
W tttttt III VIII-II ‘Iv f f V I II-

–¢n–nn’ – QL l—.3:–1i–¢& ‘ Q1 ‘ hi Q’ Qnflfid EH3 ‘HQ
U L 3 “J VII.

–::-u- 1- -rs.’–1-rs-qr’ .-

‘.yIuIvIu=I I. 3 . ._ g nu-

uid judgment 0!.’ conviction and sentence. t-.00

patitionar prottrud cg-1.3.. II0. 622107. J . ..

i3.fii.fi? oxoeuizo 3 pi.-:0pona.i’.’~–Ai’00nsi Q’ul0.. ‘ ” V

lurthu 00000.00 that no 0
taating 1000000100 that
meant, us put us; ‘ 11.01.07.

Thornton 0 tin *0:-5.01 M r. :..w. and
0.3.1: to the 0 pray: to:

rour 9:00.30. 5* at tho chuquo

mount. -. ‘

Lu V .’….__”…;.=….i nu… ……a._.|.s1 .l_ I
91.16 ‘-sh-vunsy. , uu yIIu.I.u.vnI.I.’ ¢u wa.J..I.uI’I

tho ii: ii
ta pgntiafi’ that tin petition» has not taught for

X or -.-no mu: uatod 11.07.01 0000 in

‘ 010.021-‘I07 on tho £110 01 1″l’c–6. Bangalore,
but has challenged the order 0! tho 0:101 court

issuing r.r..l’. and u.I.v.

“‘_”””””‘l”‘|»l’l'” 1 ‘IT. I TTVIIVRI TI U’-I’llI\I’l’lIl’\I\l’ IIITII C Wu”. TI I\1f’I.I\I’f’Il’II\uI” III’9lI E

6. In vim at the above. the petition _1_.s

allowd and he in dinctud to dapoait 251 at.

chm; agguzslz in th-I 221;; is met I.-ith.;a

_——‘ .. . .. …–_ _ —–_ .. _ –. ‘ wfl’-V’
Inna 5.-J-no -ad hfin annual ml an ‘ill -I 1-L’;-.nVV-‘s–.
fifi 9” Wm ‘IN V.” 6U$aLllJ-11′] fif’ ” “I33, _ 5′.’ ‘V I

today. rumniingiy. ‘tho on-um» ¥11.i3

nan in ¢zJ..A.IIo.-623/O7 is

nng:,lat.r.-;r L; “‘=:1;j:;n:._§u:n_ 1:99;.-g1:.:L1.r9

Ii M-in F O-In Va nan… in ‘.

twin :3-Iv-In :2 -ul– ‘ Cqéwfi uu-IA Qvm-V’ gj
4; I ‘ t .’ ‘ h ‘T5
nnh-I inf Anna
In-lmnuiulolnluuh 9