Sri Lakshmana Murthy K S/O Gowde … vs The Bangalore University Reptd By … on 27 June, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  "  %
DATED THIS THE 2% DAY OF JUNE 2oe$%R   If  T T
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AJf1'..,j;'€:;UN$T.k"{R   * A 
WRIT PETITION NO.3'fiWiv,:O/Zodééféiffi-I AA   
WRIT PETITION.'N0,.3?'Qg5j'2QO6  

BETWEEN :
In W.P.3210/2096. §;  

Sri.Lakshnt1a1f.1_a Mmfitay  _  '--

S/o.Gowdcf'VGo£vda;',_   _

Aged 53 Y€3J'S;. ' .   ' ' pi M Qw
Working as 13'..ssi--star3tf.,"  ._   Cg ¢.~«*:_ \;_.ge.r«'
Syndicate Sectif'i:h£:v..(3x.*)§r1stitution 0f India with a prayer to

 'me mspgmdent to reckon the retrospective
4' Iegulafizafjon of the pettitieners, in the

st of Junior

.j'Assie-tant \iv;i1;h effect fi*om 01. 12.5' or all service

  _H_These writ petitions coming' on for pre£munary' '

)4/W'   in 'B' Group, this day, the Court made the



V ".;-TAA'.VVf5etition   of accordingly. ,

-5-

seniority. That having not been done, I am of the 
that a suitable direction is required to be gven fco mt  t 
respondents to consider the objections of the

and finalise the seniority list A ;_o

Consequently, following order is: – ._ .

(a) Petitions stand; the
respondent to of the
petitionere to prepare
the outer limit
of Q-fxte of receipt of this

order. .. .’ J .

(1)) Indeed if entitled for any
w «_ which flow from fixing

they shall be paid.

Sd/–

Judge

6–8–2008

ORDER ONLA. II/08 A

W.P. N0. 3g10/oamb/Aw \x;5I3§ :A
An application is
preamble of the judmqent instead of
1.12.1998, it shall ‘4 Application

granted. I\ieot;*=~saz’y.,_ ‘ ‘ cut in the

,, ….. _ I