Karnataka High Court
Sri Muniyappa vs Sri Bailappa S/O Obaiah on 27 July, 2009
>aawI'VIm'mu wwwwwwnwm se 6?
awn: wwwmg .»,gra- smnnmmmmmm Wflfiww mwwm W?" mmwwmfimmvh Wéwm fiawwwfi W2" Mmmmmmm mmw ammm W? mmmmmgwa mam firmm:
1
IN THE HIGH CQIRT OF KARKATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 27''" BAY OF JULY 2099
BEFORE
ms Holman ma. wanes A81-IGK
5
Aazbmmnsamms
3/0
R/AT BACHALLI vn.1g:.G1': ',
DEVAHAI-IALL_I'l'ALUK,j=.
% % V ...PETlTIONER
%%%% M ADVOCATE)
Aenmmcxrr 31 YEARS
Ymm
" -- [DIG N
Atzm man 51 YEARS
% $10 MUHIYAPPA
AGED A3001' 51 YEARS
sm.1m1~x
IVMVKIU vuwwwmnnmmxu wan >oow«mn<mw<r~uww
3
2.'I'hefiumaoftmma¢t:1bried'arothatthe
patit':::n:arfiedth:esuit£nr%11tix;iurx:tinn. Inthe
suit proceeding, he am aougm ad-mm-am
was made to oonmue durmg 5 %
3. In the dmdant
and I.A.Ro.1 order
granmcl _ its order, dated
2.5.2009
allowed I.A.No.1 and
1 mwwaw “bl!” §”&I%I!W’WW&&s6″‘”HWF$ FISH’??? W..«\J%.;iH’%§_.”‘-.é’E” KWEKKVHEMRWI 5W§\Wfl”¥ 5a.n’3nJ’VJ|’€% WW Ewfiflfififlkflfwfl ¥”‘lM’-‘WWW mwwna W6 mwwmmwmwwmmwm we
mecution and operation of the
5. Sri K.Ma1g’1n:nth, tho luanrnad counsel Ear the
pemsom aumsniu mtg?’ pwmnmpmmm 3 ram