High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Sadashiva Reddy vs Smt Jayamma on 23 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Sadashiva Reddy vs Smt Jayamma on 23 November, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS T1"i{~I 23"' DAY OI' NOVEMBER. 2009 

I3 EFO RE

THE HONBLE3 §.\/ER.JUST1CI«3 SUBHASH I-3.Af)1 V  A

MISCELLANEOUS I~"IRS'I' APPEAEJNO. 10465.'/'}':en:§.r;sV"  

BETWEEN :

Sri. Sadashiva Roddy.

S/o Late A.P. Krishna Roddy.
Aged about 55 years,

R/ at Agara Village,

Begur Hobli,

Bangalore South Taluk,

Bangalore.

 _ _  ..§.P»r3ELLAN"r

[By Sri. L. van1;aw:éxtafiié.~;'_r2e;1_a3f,1-.4}.dv_.<-) if; 

AND:

Sr1":€,.:vvJa}.'arz1rz'r:=:;~.. _» 2 ' A

W/ o iate Pasala'«Red'dyd.'d'e'--- 
Aged ab.ouL 55'years.,_  '

Spat.' Sharrkt:niha1arrfir1'1a.
 }".o } at e uRama'C:'h:-3..nd1'a Reddy.

" . V Aged""ar'boo'i._.53 years.

A  

.' .S;'*o 1ate.--"jA.I.'. Krishna Reddy.

Aged  50 _Vears,

Sri...Jar1a1'dl1z111e1 Roddy'.

A 'S/no late AP. Krishna Roddy.

  * Aged about 47 years.

 Nos. 1. to 4 are residing at

A Agara Village. Begur E---Iobli,

Bangalore South 'I'a1uk.
Banga1()re.

[Deieted as per Order datecl 27. E02009)



5. Sri. R.C. Srinivasa.

S / 0 Chowdappa.

Aged about 45 years.

R/at D.\/CB. Road.

Near Venkateshwara Sweet Stall.
Bagepalli 'l"0wn.

Bagepalli Taluk.

K0131' District

6. Sri. G. Muniratnam   ».

S/0 Sri. Gangaiah Naidu. '

Aged about 57 years.

R/at No.32 1/7,

7"" 'B' Cross,

Lake Side. 80 Feet. Road. V

Jakkasandra, K0ran12__3.nga1a.____.  '

15' E?-Eock, V J   A  _. V 

B.an.ga:cn~e -- 560 034."= ~ ..   ;   .. "....RE:sP0NDE:m's
{By Srid. Imayan & 53-ri. M.:Si'1iv:1fppa,_i7Qr C/RVEJ
{R5 -- R.C. Sr.iniVa.«3zi'«Se_%rved_)     

 ..I+4".iV}.--'ef".'5s.'10}'3eal is flied under Order 43
Rule l[r) ana.._2.of CFC.' :,1§a_j 1iét. the Order dated 05.11.2008
passed 0r1_I.A.NC3.{_3  in'0.sv.N6."79e5/2007 on the file 01' XXXVEII

 .."A(idIti()'I'I3E1}icifiy C1\}iE'«.&____.Sessi0ns Judge. Be11'1gaE0re, ailowing
7l¢.A. Ne.._3' ff.Eed L_I1'ider Order 39 Rules 1 81 2 R/W Sec'£..l0I1 151 of

C'}J.,rj,Vi'0_r 'fe11'jp0i':ir3rv InjL1nCt:i0n.

'Th.is.__appe'al coming on for admisssion this day. the Court

_.  jg 2.C1e}.ivered '{hVe'3~f0l10wi31g:



W3w

JUDGMENT

Heard both the counsels.

After h€E11″i11g for some iime. both the C()LlI’1S€31..’S~1.1:b.f£i’E.i«S

‘Ehat. if p1ai11i”iff as well as defendant No.6 are di1’€(‘,E_.f:C3 lief V-

up any consi.ruc:i,i()r1 on i:he pi’operi.yH _c:iaiv_.–‘ied” _ {“55}

defendant. that wiii suffice the purpose iiliihiiieitlispifiszil’i3i7_ih..e’

suit”.

2. in View of the said subni»ii*s.sio13. i:hi’s«f_cippeei%1 stands

disposed of with the fO11OVVi11.G_,VLfi!’€!§T'[.iQI1S:’
Plaintiff orhis age’hijs–,.fpei’sQ11s elainxied under him.

defendarii pei’;3ofis eiaiiimed under him

are reéii9é1i’1eieg3 eonsti*uei.i0n on the
VEtCaIif.’S!’i’c.C parcel of Khata N0. E8/4
p1’es_eIii1iii”c.0rI1eVsv:Viiiridei”eioiiinianaliaiii CMC limit with
nieéisuiti.:ig 40 ft. on the Northern side, 40

‘ side, 6 ft. on the Elastem side. 28 ft.
side. in aii 680 sq.i'”i;. and bounded on:
I5V1″i\/ate Pr0per’s:y. West. by Site No.22. North by

AA Read South by Site No.24.

sci/4
JUDGE

mp/M