IN me HIGH couar or KARNATAKA AT BAN61§%§1:;0::§f§V:. "
DATED was me 10*" my OF tvécaatasa,
BEFORE %
THE HCNBLE MRJUSTICE MoH'£?~¥:._'§'>HAN'fAN;A *
REA H0ovu~IAKERE.MA'ta7a,
Kuumkx, .Vfj~, _Ko'iz§:sHw§xKA
KUNDAPURA TALU'K;£_JI)HUE?§qB£$T;».._ _
. ._ PETITIONER
(By Sri : H IAYAKARA ..--~
AND:
1
N;=&,AS}IȣPIA
sro SOMA MARAKALA
.' 'AGED,A13{3--"£}'I"'48 YEARS
_ 'R;'A'£.N'Qi4GvE;'KU13;fl{i VILLAGE 01:: KOTESHWARA
" ._P"OST, "§{IJ:€}3§éfURA TALUK, 1131313131 ms';
ta?
B$1ASi§._ARA . A
szo 1.,A'1':«; Komxm MARAKAL3.'B1
AGE!) ABOUT 35 YEARS
" Rr'A_T.NO.401, KUMRI VILLAGE OF KOTESHWARA
V' 2 _ KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DIST.
'' GIRLUA A
. .. 9:0 KORATEH Tm
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
RIATI-IOOVB'JAKERE MANE,
..5..
2. The records» disclose that the mether of
respondents 1 to 8 viz, Korathi Ma1'akalthi filedfiozm
No.1′ for grant of occupancy
members of the joint famiiy: ,
under enquiry before the Petitioner,
who is the brother cléftrés to have
filed separate,_ applicafign * No.7 claiming
However,
filing H 1′, r}s;~’:1’iously disputed by
respd§f;dcI#t;§.i”t£n the matter has to be decided
finally this Court does not wish to
ccgtgijtaieitt any of; that aspect of the matter.
‘A occasion, the matter had come up
Court in WP.No.28421/ 1995 c/w.
Lk w15;:~;a’.ég3’I4r6/1995. This Qourt while deciding the said
V’ .. iv’:*itéApéi’;itians, afier perusing the records has prima. facie
:;t5s¢wed that the appiication filed by Korathi
V’ ‘Marakalthi only is on record and that the application
V5
. 7 .
The Land Tribunal, Kundapura is
an opportmaity to the petitioner to lead
to argue in the matter.
Siam long time, the Triburxa} ” ,
as expeditiously as ‘b1_;§t the
euter limit of four of
this order. The for early
disposal
kpetitiég; 15 §gf’a€x§<:rding1y.
sal-
Iudge
=~§1z;; bsgié X