High Court Kerala High Court

Sudhir Gopi vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 10 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
Sudhir Gopi vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 10 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36196 of 2008(H)


1. SUDHIR GOPI, AGED 48 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION,

3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :10/12/2008

 O R D E R
                         ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                    --------------------------
                     W.P.(C) No. 36196 of 2008
             -------------------------------------
             Dated this the 10th day of December, 2008

                            J U D G M E N T

Heard both sides.

2. The grievance of the petitioner pertains to Exts.P4, P5 &

P6. While the petitioner contends that the amount demanded by

Exts.P4, P5 & P6 ought not have been demanded in view of Exts.P2

& P3 interim orders of this Court in WP(C) No.26822/2008, the

learned standing counsel for the Board contends that the demand

made in Exts.P4 to P6 is not related to the subject matter of the

writ petition referred to above.

2. This being a factual issue, it has to be resolved by an

Officer of the Board itself, and in my view, the 3rd respondent is the

most competent officer to determine this factual controversy. I,

therefore, direct that it will be open to the petitioner to file his

objections to Exts.P4 to P6 bills to the 3rd respondent within two

weeks from today, in which case, the 3rd respondent shall consider

the objections raised by the petitioner with notice to him and

decide the matter. It is directed that the consideration of the

objections shall be conditional on the petitioner paying the energy

W.P.(C) No.36196/2008
-2-

charges that are demanded by Ext.P6. Needless to say that subject

to the condition as above, further proceedings for realizing the

balance amount due under Ext.P6 will be kept in abeyance and its

realisation will depend upon the decision to be taken by the 3rd

respondent on the objections to be filed by the petitioner against

Exts.P4 to P6.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg